Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dan Dutartre

dblp:282/3805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 77% Time series and sequential data · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
reservoir computing
0.812024
Reservoir Computing for Short High-Dimensional Time Series: an Application to SARS-CoV-2 Hospitalization Forecast · ICML 2024
Medical and health informatics › public health › public health informatics
epidemic forecasting
0.812024
Reservoir Computing for Short High-Dimensional Time Series: an Application to SARS-CoV-2 Hospitalization Forecast · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting
0.212024
Reservoir Computing for Short High-Dimensional Time Series: an Application to SARS-CoV-2 Hospitalization Forecast · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.5reservoir computing · 1.5genetic algorithm · 1.5feature selection · 1.5XGBoost · 1.5LSTM · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Reservoir Computing for Short High-Dimensional Time Series: an Application to SARS-CoV-2 Hospitalization Forecast
abstract
In this work, we aimed at forecasting the number of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized patients at 14 days to help anticipate the bed requirements of a large scale hospital using public data and electronic health records data. Previous attempts led to mitigated performance in this high-dimension setting; we introduce a novel approach to time series forecasting by providing an alternative to conventional methods to deal with high number of potential features of interest (409 predictors). We integrate Reservoir Computing (RC) with feature selection using a genetic algorithm (GA) to gather optimal non-linear combinations of inputs to improve prediction in sample-efficient context. We illustrate that the RC-GA combination exhibits excellent performance in forecasting SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations. This approach outperformed the use of RC alone and other conventional methods: LSTM, Transformers, Elastic-Net, XGBoost. Notably, this work marks the pioneering use of RC (along with GA) in the realm of short and high-dimensional time series, positioning it as a competitive and innovative approach in comparison to standard methods.
Thomas Ferté, Dan Dutartre, Boris P. Hejblum, Romain Griffier, Vianney Jouhet, Rodolphe Thiébaut, Pierrick Legrand, Xavier Hinaut
ICML2
2020 Towards measuring states of epistemic curiosity through electroencephalographic signals
abstract
Understanding the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying curiosity and therefore being able to identify the curiosity level of a person, would provide useful information for researchers and designers in numerous fields such as neuroscience, psychology, and computer science. A first step to uncovering the neural correlates of curiosity is to collect neurophysiological signals during states of curiosity, in order to develop signal processing and machine learning (ML) tools to recognize the curious states from the non-curious ones. Thus, we ran an experiment in which we used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the brain activity of participants as they were induced into states of curiosity, using trivia question and answer chains. We used two ML algorithms, i.e. Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) coupled with a Linear Discriminant Algorithm (LDA), as well as a Filter Bank Tangent Space Classifier (FBTSC), to classify the curious EEG signals from the non-curious ones. Global results indicate that both algorithms obtained better performances in the 3-to-5s time windows, suggesting an optimal time window length of 4 seconds (63.09% classification accuracy for the FBTSC, 60.93% classification accuracy for the FBCSP+LDA) to go towards curiosity states estimation based on EEG signals.
Aurélien Appriou, Jessy Ceha, Smeety Pramij, Dan Dutartre, Edith Law, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Fabien Lotte
SMC4