EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ethan J. LoCicero
dblp:282/4274
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
sampling-based model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
surgical robotics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser Surgery · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
steady-state point ablation model · 1.7sampling-based model predictive control · 1.7random search · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sampling-Based Model Predictive Control for Volumetric Ablation in Robotic Laser SurgeryabstractLaser-based surgical ablation relies heavily on surgeon involvement, restricting precision to the limits of human error and perception. The interaction between laser and tissue is governed by various laser parameters that control the laser irradiance on the tissue, including the power, distance, spot size, orientation, and exposure time. This complex interaction lends itself to robotic automation, allowing the surgeon to focus on high-level tasks, such as choosing the region and method of ablation, while the lower-level ablation plan can be handled autonomously. This paper describes a sampling-based model predictive control (MPC) scheme to plan ablation sequences for arbitrary tissue volumes. Using a steady-state point ablation model to simulate a single laser-tissue interaction, a random search technique explores the reachable state space while preserving sensitive tissue regions. The sampled MPC strategy provides an ablation sequence that accounts for parameter uncertainty without violating constraints, such as avoiding nerve bundles. Vincent Wang 0006, Siobhan Rigby Oca, Ethan J. LoCicero, Patrick J. Codd, Leila Bridgeman |
ICRA | 4 |