Florian Bolli

dblp:282/4299 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Steering Prediction via a Multi-Sensor System for Autonomous Racing
abstract
Autonomous racing has rapidly gained research attention. Traditionally, racing cars rely on 2D LiDAR as their primary visual system. In this work, we explore the integration of an event camera with the existing system to provide enhanced temporal information. Our goal is to fuse the 2D LiDAR data with event data in an end-to-end learning framework for steering prediction, which is crucial for autonomous racing. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing this challenging research topic. We start by creating a multisensor dataset specifically for steering prediction. Using this dataset, we establish a benchmark by evaluating various SOTA fusion methods. Our observations reveal that existing methods often incur substantial computational costs. To address this, we apply low-rank techniques to propose a novel, efficient, and effective fusion design. We introduce a new fusion learning policy to guide the fusion process, enhancing robustness against misalignment. Our fusion architecture provides better steering prediction than LiDAR alone, significantly reducing the RMSE from 7.72 to 1.28. Compared to the second-best fusion method, our work represents only 11% of the learnable parameters while achieving better accuracy. The source code and dataset are publicly available at: https://github.com/ZZY-Zhou/F1Tenth-Steering.
Zhuyun Zhou, Zongwei Wu, Florian Bolli, Rémi Boutteau, Fan Yang 0019, Radu Timofte, Dominique Ginhac, Tobi Delbruck
ICRA3
2025 FPGA Hardware Neural Control of CartPole and F1TENTH Race Car
abstract
Latency and computational cost often limit the use of Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) in real-time robotics. To address this limitation, our work investigates FPGA-implemented Neural Controllers (NC) trained through supervised learning, mimicking NMPC. We show that inexpensive embedded FPGA hardware is sufficient to implement these neural controllers for high-frequency control of robotic systems. We demonstrate kilohertz control rates for a cartpole and offload control to the FPGA hardware on the F1TENTH race car. The FPGA NC outperforms NMPC on the cartpole, due to the faster control rate afforded by faster NC inference. The code and hardware implementation for this paper are available at https://github.com/SensorsINI/Neural-Control-Tools.
Marcin Paluch, Florian Bolli, Antonio Rios-Navarro, Chang Gao 0002, Tobi Delbruck
IROS2
2023 RPGD: A Small-Batch Parallel Gradient Descent Optimizer with Explorative Resampling for Nonlinear Model Predictive Control
abstract
Nonlinear model predictive control often involves nonconvex optimization for which real-time control systems require fast and numerically stable solutions. This work proposes RPGD, a Resampling Parallel Gradient Descent optimizer designed to exploit small-batch parallelism of modern hardware like neural accelerators or multithreaded microcontrollers. After initialization, it continuously maintains a small population of good control trajectory solution candidates and improves them using gradient information, followed by selection of elite candidates and resampling of the others. In simulation on a cartpole, the OpenAI Gym mountain car, a Dubins car with obstacles, and a high input dimensional 2D arm, it produces similar or lower MPC costs than benchmark cross-entropy and path integral methods. On a physical cartpole, it performs swing-up and cart target following of the pole, using either a differential equation or multilayer perceptron as dynamics model. RPGD drives an F1TENTH simulated race car at near-optimal lap times and a real F1TENTH car in laps around a cluttered room. We study alterations of RPGD's building blocks to justify its composition. RPGD compute time in Python with TensorFlow optimization running on CPU is 2 to 4 times slower than the FORCESPRO commercial embedded solver.
Frederik Heetmeyer, Marcin Paluch, Diego Bolliger, Florian Bolli, Ennio Filicicchia, Tobi Delbruck
ICRA4