Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jihee Park

dblp:282/6119 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6792-5161ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Program analysis · 88% Programming languages and type systems · 12%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis
binary analysis
1.522025
Bridging the Gap between Real-World and Formal Binary Lifting through Filtered-Simulation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Static Analysis of JNI Programs via Binary Decompilation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Program analysis › binary analysis
binary lifting
0.912025
Bridging the Gap between Real-World and Formal Binary Lifting through Filtered-Simulation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Program analysis › static analysis
cross-language analysis
0.712023
Static Analysis of JNI Programs via Binary Decompilation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Program analysis
static analysis
0.712023
Static Analysis of JNI Programs via Binary Decompilation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics
0.412020
JISET: JavaScript IR-based Semantics Extraction Toolchain · ASE 2020
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.212023
Static Analysis of JNI Programs via Binary Decompilation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
javascript semantics
0.112020
JISET: JavaScript IR-based Semantics Extraction Toolchain · ASE 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 1.3summary-based analysis · 1.3binary decompilation · 1.3formal verification · 0.9bisimulation · 0.9static analysis · 0.4intermediate representation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bridging the Gap between Real-World and Formal Binary Lifting through Filtered-Simulation
abstract
Binary lifting is a key component in binary analysis tools. In order to guarantee the correctness of binary lifting, researchers have proposed various formally verified lifters. However, such formally verified lifters have too strict requirements on binary, which do not sufficiently reflect real-world lifters. In addition, real-world lifters use heuristic-based assumptions to lift binary code, which makes it difficult to guarantee the correctness of the lifted code using formal methods. In this paper, we propose a new interpretation of the correctness of real-world binary lifting. We formalize the process of binary lifting with heuristic-based assumptions used in real-world lifters by dividing it into a series of transformations, where each transformation represents a lift with new abstraction features. We define the correctness of each transformation as filtered-simulation , which is a variant of bi-simulation, between programs before and after transformation. We present three essential transformations in binary lifting and formalize them: (1) control flow graph reconstruction, (2) abstract stack reconstruction, and (3) function input/output identification. We implement our approach for x86-64 Linux binaries, named fible , and demonstrate that it can correctly lift Coreutils and CGC datasets compiled with GCC.
Jihee Park, Insu Yun, Sukyoung Ryu
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1
2023 Static Analysis of JNI Programs via Binary Decompilation
abstract
JNI programs are widely used thanks to the combined benefits of C and Java programs. However, because understanding the interaction behaviors between two different programming languages is challenging, JNI program development is difficult to get right and vulnerable to security attacks. Thus, researchers have proposed static analysis of JNI program source code to detect bugs and security vulnerabilities in JNI programs. Unfortunately, such source code analysis is not applicable to compiled JNI programs that are not open-sourced or open-source JNI programs containing third-party binary libraries. While JN-SAF, the state-of-the-art analyzer for compiled JNI programs, can analyze binary code, it has several limitations due to its symbolic execution and summary-based bottom-up analysis. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to statically analyze compiled JNI programs without their source code using binary decompilation. Unlike JN-SAF that analyzes binaries directly, our approach decompiles binaries and analyzes JNI programs with the decompiled binaries using an existing JNI program analyzer for source code. To decompile binaries to compilable C source code with precise JNI-interoperation-related types, we improve an existing decompilation tool by leveraging the characteristics of JNI programs. Our evaluation shows that the approach is precise as almost the same as the state-of-the-art JNI program analyzer for source code, and more precise than JN-SAF.
Jihee Park, Jaemin Hong, Sukyoung Ryu
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
2020 JISET: JavaScript IR-based Semantics Extraction Toolchain
abstract
JavaScript was initially designed for client-side programming in web browsers, but its engine is now embedded in various kinds of host software. Despite the popularity, since the JavaScript semantics is complex especially due to its dynamic nature, understanding and reasoning about JavaScript programs are challenging tasks. Thus, researchers have proposed several attempts to define the formal semantics of JavaScript based on ECMAScript, the official JavaScript specification. However, the existing approaches are manual, labor-intensive, and error-prone and all of their formal semantics target ECMAScript 5.1 (ES5.1, 2011) or its former versions. Therefore, they are not suitable for understanding modern JavaScript language features introduced since ECMAScript 6 (ES6, 2015). Moreover, ECMAScript has been annually updated since ES6, which already made five releases after ES5.1.
Jihyeok Park, Jihee Park, Seungmin An, Sukyoung Ryu
ASE2