Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chaiyakarn Khanan

dblp:282/6143 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories
commit analysis
0.412020
JITBot: An Explainable Just-In-Time Defect Prediction Bot · ASE 2020
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories
defect prediction
0.412020
JITBot: An Explainable Just-In-Time Defect Prediction Bot · ASE 2020
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories › defect prediction
just-in-time defect prediction
0.412020
JITBot: An Explainable Just-In-Time Defect Prediction Bot · ASE 2020
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.412020
JITBot: An Explainable Just-In-Time Defect Prediction Bot · ASE 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
explainable prediction
0.112020
JITBot: An Explainable Just-In-Time Defect Prediction Bot · ASE 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.112020
JITBot: An Explainable Just-In-Time Defect Prediction Bot · ASE 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

explainability · 0.9classification · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 JITBot: An Explainable Just-In-Time Defect Prediction Bot
abstract
Just-In-Time (JIT) defect prediction is a classification model that is trained using historical data to predict bug-introducing changes. However, recent studies raised concerns related to the explainability of the predictions of many software analytics applications (i.e., practitioners do not understand why commits are risky and how to improve them). In addition, the adoption of Just-In-Time defect prediction is still limited due to a lack of integration into CI/CD pipelines and modern software development platforms (e.g., GitHub). In this paper, we present an explainable Just-In-Time defect prediction framework to automatically generate feedback to developers by providing the riskiness of each commit, explaining why such commit is risky, and suggesting risk mitigation plans. The proposed framework is integrated into the GitHub CI/CD pipeline as a GitHub application to continuously monitor and analyse a stream of commits in many GitHub repositories. Finally, we discuss the usage scenarios and their implications to practitioners. The VDO demonstration is available at https://jitbot-tool.github.io/
Chaiyakarn Khanan, Worawit Luewichana, Krissakorn Pruktharathikoon, Jirayus Jiarpakdee, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Morakot Choetkiertikul, Chaiyong Ragkhitwetsagul, Thanwadee Sunetnanta
ASE1