Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Narges Honarvar Nazari

dblp:282/6660 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-0737-0832ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal understanding
0.512021
Interpreting the Rhetoric of Visual Advertisements · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
advertisement analysis
0.512021
Interpreting the Rhetoric of Visual Advertisements · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video understanding
0.112021
Interpreting the Rhetoric of Visual Advertisements · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

story construction · 1.0spatial-temporal analysis · 1.0multimodal cues · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Interpreting the Rhetoric of Visual Advertisements
abstract
Visual media have important persuasive power, but prior computer vision approaches have predominantly ignored the persuasive aspects of images. In this work, we propose a suite of data and techniques that enable progress on understanding the messages that visual advertisements convey. We make available a dataset of 64,832 image ads and 3,477 video ads, annotated with ten types of information: the topic and sentiment of the ad; whether it is funny, exciting, or effective; what action it prompts the viewer to do, and what arguments it provides for why this action should be taken; symbolic associations that the ad relies on; the metaphorical object transformations on which especially creative ads rely; and the climax in video ads. We develop methods that use multimodal cues, i.e., both visuals and slogans, for both the image and video domains. Our methods rely on finding poignant content spatially and temporally. We also examine the creative story construction in ads: for videos, we learn to predict when the climax occurs (if any), and how effective the story is; for images, we analyze how object transformations in ads metaphorically depict product properties.
Keren Ye, Narges Honarvar Nazari, Zaeem Hussain, Adriana Kovashka
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2