Robbert Reijnen

dblp:282/7591 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1629-6040ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 22% Reinforcement learning · 20%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
1.622025
Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025
Online Control of Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Using Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICAPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
dynamic algorithm configuration
0.912025
Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
multi-objective combinatorial optimization
0.912025
Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › multi-agent path finding
large neighborhood search
0.812024
Online Control of Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Using Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICAPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › combinatorial optimization
traveling salesman problem
0.712023
The first AI4TSP competition: Learning to solve stochastic routing problems · Artif. Intell. 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.312025
Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
state representation
0.312025
Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.212023
The first AI4TSP competition: Learning to solve stochastic routing problems · Artif. Intell. 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
model-based optimization
0.212023
The first AI4TSP competition: Learning to solve stochastic routing problems · Artif. Intell. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep reinforcement learning · 3.9markov decision process · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7evolutionary computation · 1.7bayesian optimization · 1.5adaptive large neighborhood search · 1.5surrogate-based optimization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Search Trajectory Network-Enhanced Multi-Objective Dynamic Algorithm Configuration
abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has emerged as an effective technique for dynamic algorithm configuration, particularly in evolutionary computation, enabling adaptive parameter updates during algorithmic execution. DRL-based methods have shown broad applicability across different problem domains and are designed to configure algorithms without problem-specific information, making them highly transferable across problem variants and scalable to different problem sizes. This paper proposes a novel graph neural network-based approach that learns representations of Search Trajectory Networks (STNs) to track the convergence behavior of multiple objectives and dynamically reconfigures multi-objective evolutionary algorithms during execution. By capturing how solutions evolve and interact over time, the STN-based state representation enables real-time insight into convergence, diversity, and their trade-offs, facilitating more informed and adaptive configuration decisions. Extensive experiments indicate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art DRL-based algorithm configuration methods. It also demonstrates good scalability to large problem instances and effectiveness in real-world optimization problems, which are often computationally expensive to tune.
Robbert Reijnen, Zaharah Bukhsh, Hoong Chuin Lau, Yaoxin Wu, Yingqian Zhang 0001
ECAI1
2025 Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization
abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been widely used for dynamic algorithm configuration, particularly in evolutionary computation, which benefits from the adaptive update of parameters during the algorithmic execution. However, applying DRL to algorithm configuration for multi-objective combinatorial optimization (MOCO) problems remains relatively unexplored. This paper presents a novel graph neural network (GNN) based DRL to configure multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. We model the dynamic algorithm configuration as a Markov decision process, representing the convergence of solutions in the objective space by a graph, with their embeddings learned by a GNN to enhance the state representation. Experiments on diverse MOCO challenges indicate that our method outperforms traditional and DRL-based algorithm configuration methods in terms of efficacy and adaptability. It also exhibits advantageous generalizability across objective types and problem sizes, and applicability to different evolutionary computation methods.
Robbert Reijnen, Yaoxin Wu, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian Zhang 0001
ICML1
2024 Online Control of Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
abstract
The Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS) algorithm has shown considerable success in solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). Nonetheless, the performance of ALNS relies on the proper configuration of its selection and acceptance parameters, which is known to be a complex and resource-intensive task. To address this, we introduce a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) based approach called DR-ALNS that selects operators, adjusts parameters, and controls the acceptance criterion throughout the search. The proposed method aims to learn, based on the state of the search, to configure ALNS for the next iteration to yield more effective solutions for the given optimization problem. We evaluate the proposed method on an orienteering problem with stochastic weights and time windows, as presented in an IJCAI competition. The results show that our approach outperforms vanilla ALNS, ALNS tuned with Bayesian optimization, and two state-of-the-art DRL approaches that were the winning methods of the competition, achieving this with significantly fewer training observations. Furthermore, we demonstrate several good properties of the proposed DR-ALNS method: it is easily adapted to solve different routing problems, its learned policies perform consistently well across various instance sizes, and these policies can be directly applied to different problem variants.
Robbert Reijnen, Yingqian Zhang 0001, Hoong Chuin Lau, Zaharah Allah Bukhsh
ICAPS1
2023 The first AI4TSP competition: Learning to solve stochastic routing problems
abstract
This paper reports on the first international competition on AI for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021 (IJCAI-21). The TSP is one of the classical combinatorial optimization problems, with many variants inspired by real-world applications. This first competition asked the participants to develop algorithms to solve an orienteering problem with stochastic weights and time windows (OPSWTW). It focused on two learning approaches: surrogate-based optimization and deep reinforcement learning. In this paper, we describe the problem, the competition setup, and the winning methods, and give an overview of the results. The winning methods described in this work have advanced the state-of-the-art in using AI for stochastic routing problems. Overall, by organizing this competition we have introduced routing problems as an interesting problem setting for AI researchers. The simulator of the problem has been made open-source and can be used by other researchers as a benchmark for new learning-based methods. The instances and code for the competition are available at https://github.com/paulorocosta/ai-for-tsp-competition.
Yingqian Zhang 0001, Laurens Bliek, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira da Costa, Reza Refaei Afshar, Robbert Reijnen, Tom Catshoek, Daniël Vos, Sicco Verwer, Fynn Schmitt-Ulms, André Hottung, Tapan Shah 0001, Meinolf Sellmann, Kevin Tierney, Carl Perreault-Lafleur, Caroline Leboeuf, Federico Bobbio, Justine Pepin, Warley Almeida Silva, Ricardo Gama, Hugo L. Fernandes, Martin Zaefferer, Manuel López-Ibáñez 0001, Ekhine Irurozki
Artif. Intell.5