Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlo Abate

dblp:282/7958 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.912025
MaxCutPool: differentiable feature-aware Maxcut for pooling in graph neural networks · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph pooling
0.912025
MaxCutPool: differentiable feature-aware Maxcut for pooling in graph neural networks · ICLR 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
max-cut
0.912025
MaxCutPool: differentiable feature-aware Maxcut for pooling in graph neural networks · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › heterophily
heterophilic graph
0.312025
MaxCutPool: differentiable feature-aware Maxcut for pooling in graph neural networks · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical pooling · 1.7differentiable optimization · 1.7MAXCUT · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MaxCutPool: differentiable feature-aware Maxcut for pooling in graph neural networks
abstract
We propose a novel approach to compute the MAXCUT in attributed graphs, i.e., graphs with features associated with nodes and edges. Our approach works well on any kind of graph topology and can find solutions that jointly optimize the MAXCUT along with other objectives. Based on the obtained MAXCUT partition, we implement a hierarchical graph pooling layer for Graph Neural Networks, which is sparse, trainable end-to-end, and particularly suitable for downstream tasks on heterophilic graphs.
Carlo Abate, Filippo Maria Bianchi
ICLR1