EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel D. Scherer
dblp:283/0049
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0355-4140ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum machine learning |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Benchmarking Quantum Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2025 Quantum Policy Gradient Algorithm with Optimized Action Decoding · ICML 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum machine learning
quantum reinforcement learning |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Benchmarking Quantum Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2025 Quantum Policy Gradient Algorithm with Optimized Action Decoding · ICML 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum circuit simulation
circuit cutting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Cutting for Hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman Simulation of Quantum Circuits · DAC 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum circuit simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Cutting for Hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman Simulation of Quantum Circuits · DAC 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Cutting for Hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman Simulation of Quantum Circuits · DAC 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Quantum Policy Gradient Algorithm with Optimized Action Decoding · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical estimator · 1.7benchmarking methodology · 1.7variational quantum circuit · 1.3quantum measurements · 1.3statevector simulation · 0.9circuit cutting · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Joint Cutting for Hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman Simulation of Quantum CircuitsabstractDespite the continuous advancements in size and robustness of real quantum devices, reliable large-scale quantum computers are not yet available. Hence, classical simulation of quantum algorithms remains crucial for testing new methods and estimating quantum advantage. Pushing classical simulation methods to their limit is essential, particularly due to their inherent exponential complexity. Besides the established Schrödinger-style full statevector simulation, so-called Hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman (HSF) approaches have shown promise to make simulations more efficient. HSF simulation employs the idea of “cutting” the circuit into smaller parts, reducing their execution times. This, however, comes at the cost of an exponential overhead in the number of cuts. Inspired by the domain of Quantum Circuit Cutting, we propose an HSF simulation method based on the idea of “joint cutting” to significantly reduce the aforementioned overhead. This means that, prior to the cutting procedure, gates are collected into “blocks” and all gates in a block are jointly cut instead of individually. We investigate how the proposed refinement can help decrease simulation times and highlight the remaining challenges. Experimental evaluations show that “joint cutting” can outperform the standard HSF simulation by up to a factor $\approx 4000 \times$ and the Schrödinger-style simulation by a factor $\approx 200 \times$ for suitable instances. The implementation is available at https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qsim-joint-cutting. Laura S. Herzog, Lukas Burgholzer, Christian Ufrecht, Daniel D. Scherer, Robert Wille |
DAC | 4 |
| 2025 | Benchmarking Quantum Reinforcement LearningabstractBenchmarking and establishing proper statistical validation metrics for reinforcement learning (RL) remain ongoing challenges, where no consensus has been established yet. The emergence of quantum computing and its potential applications in quantum reinforcement learning (QRL) further complicate benchmarking efforts. To enable valid performance comparisons and to streamline current research in this area, we propose a novel benchmarking methodology, which is based on a statistical estimator for sample complexity and a definition of statistical outperformance. Furthermore, considering QRL, our methodology casts doubt on some previous claims regarding its superiority. We conducted experiments on a novel benchmarking environment with flexible levels of complexity. While we still identify possible advantages, our findings are more nuanced overall. We discuss the potential limitations of these results and explore their implications for empirical research on quantum advantage in QRL. Nico Meyer, Christian Ufrecht, George Yammine, Georgios D. Kontes, Christopher Mutschler, Daniel D. Scherer |
ICML | 6 |
| 2024 | BCQQ: Batch-Constraint Quantum Q-Learning with Cyclic Data Re-uploadingabstractDeep reinforcement learning (DRL) often requires a large number of data and environment interactions, making the training process time-consuming. This challenge is further exacerbated in the case of batch RL, where the agent is trained solely on a pre-collected dataset without environment interactions. Recent advancements in quantum computing suggest that quantum models might require less data for training compared to classical methods. In this paper, we investigate this potential advantage by proposing a batch RL algorithm that utilizes variational quantum circuits (VQCs) as function approximators within the discrete batch-constraint deep Q-learning (BCQ) algorithm. Additionally, we introduce a novel data re-uploading scheme by cyclically shifting the order of input variables in the data encoding layers. We evaluate the efficiency of our algorithm on the OpenAI CartPole environment and compare its performance to the classical neural network-based discrete BCQ. Maniraman Periyasamy, Marc Hölle, Marco Wiedmann, Daniel D. Scherer, Axel Plinge, Christopher Mutschler |
IJCNN | 4 |
| 2023 | Quantum Policy Gradient Algorithm with Optimized Action DecodingabstractQuantum machine learning implemented by variational quantum circuits (VQCs) is considered a promising concept for the noisy intermediate-scale quantum computing era. Focusing on applications in quantum reinforcement learning, we propose an action decoding procedure for a quantum policy gradient approach. We introduce a quality measure that enables us to optimize the classical post-processing required for action selection, inspired by local and global quantum measurements. The resulting algorithm demonstrates a significant performance improvement in several benchmark environments. With this technique, we successfully execute a full training routine on a 5-qubit hardware device. Our method introduces only negligible classical overhead and has the potential to improve VQC-based algorithms beyond the field of quantum reinforcement learning. Nico Meyer, Daniel D. Scherer, Axel Plinge, Christopher Mutschler, Michael J. Hartmann |
ICML | 2 |