We propose a framework which generalizes “decision making with structured observations" from Foster et al. (2023) by allowing \emph{robust} (i.e. multivalued) models. In this framework, each model associates each decision with a \emph{convex set} of probability distributions over outcomes. Nature can choose distributions out of this set in an arbitrary (adversarial) manner, that can be non-oblivious and depend on past history. The resulting framework offers much greater generality than classical bandits and reinforcement learning, since the realizability assumption becomes much weaker and more realistic. We then derive a theory of regret bounds for this framework, which extends the “decision-estimation coefficients" of Foster et al. (2023). Although our lower and upper bounds are not tight, they are sufficient to fully characterize power-law learnability. We demonstrate this theory in two special cases: robust linear bandits (previously studied in Kosoy (2024)) and tabular robust online reinforcement learning (previously studied in Tian et al. (2021)). In both cases, we derive regret bounds that improve state-of-the-art (except that we do not address computational efficiency).