Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hampus Linander

dblp:283/5544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7865-8414ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 21%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network
0.912025
Learning Chern Numbers of Multiband Topological Insulators with Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer
0.812024
HEAL-SWIN: A Vision Transformer on the Sphere · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference
0.712023
Bayesian Posterior Approximation With Stochastic Ensembles · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.712023
Bayesian Posterior Approximation With Stochastic Ensembles · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.712023
Bayesian Posterior Approximation With Stochastic Ensembles · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › model ensemble
stochastic ensembles
0.712023
Bayesian Posterior Approximation With Stochastic Ensembles · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.612022
Equivariance versus Augmentation for Spherical Images · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
rotation equivariance
0.612022
Equivariance versus Augmentation for Spherical Images · ICML 2022
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.422024
HEAL-SWIN: A Vision Transformer on the Sphere · CVPR 2024
Equivariance versus Augmentation for Spherical Images · ICML 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
depth regression
0.212024
HEAL-SWIN: A Vision Transformer on the Sphere · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation
spherical representation
0.212024
HEAL-SWIN: A Vision Transformer on the Sphere · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gauge equivariant normalization · 1.7universal approximation theorems · 0.9universal approximation theorem · 0.9shifted-window attention · 0.8HEALPix grid · 0.8variational inference · 0.7monte carlo dropout · 0.7hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.7dropconnect · 0.7group equivariant convolutional network · 0.6data augmentation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Chern Numbers of Multiband Topological Insulators with Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks
abstract
Equivariant network architectures are a well-established tool for predicting invariant or equivariant quantities. However, almost all learning problems considered in this context feature a global symmetry, i.e. each point of the underlying space is transformed with the same group element, as opposed to a local *gauge* symmetry, where each point is transformed with a different group element, exponentially enlarging the size of the symmetry group. We use gauge equivariant networks to predict topological invariants (Chern numbers) of multiband topological insulators for the first time. The gauge symmetry of the network guarantees that the predicted quantity is a topological invariant. A major technical challenge is that the relevant gauge equivariant networks are plagued by instabilities in their training, severely limiting their usefulness. In particular, for larger gauge groups the instabilities make training impossible. We resolve this problem by introducing a novel gauge equivariant normalization layer which stabilizes the training. Furthermore, we prove a universal approximation theorem for our model. We train on samples with trivial Chern number only but show that our model generalizes to samples with non-trivial Chern number and provide various ablations of our setup.
Longde Huang, Oleksandr Balabanov, Hampus Linander, Mats Granath, Daniel Persson, Jan E. Gerken
NeurIPS3
2024 HEAL-SWIN: A Vision Transformer on the Sphere
abstract
High-resolution wide-angle fisheye images are becoming more and more important for robotics applications such as autonomous driving. However, using ordinary convolutional neural networks or vision transformers on this data is problematic due to projection and distortion losses introduced when projecting to a rectangular grid on the plane. We introduce the HEAL-SWIN transformer, which combines the highly uniform Hierarchi-cal Equal Area iso-Latitude Pixelation (HEALPix) grid used in astrophysics and cosmology with the Hierarchical Shifted-Window (SWIN) transformer to yield an efficient and flexible model capable of training on high-resolution, distortion-free spherical data. In HEAL-SWIN, the nested structure of the HEALPix grid is used to perform the patching and windowing operations of the SWIN transformer, enabling the network to process spherical representations with minimal computational overhead. We demonstrate the superior performance of our model on both synthetic and real automotive datasets, as well as a selection of other image datasets, for semantic segmentation, depth regression and classification tasks. Our code is publicly available11https://github.com/JanEGerken/HEAL-SWIN.
Oscar Carlsson, Jan E. Gerken, Hampus Linander, Heiner Spieß, Fredrik Ohlsson, Christoffer Petersson, Daniel Persson
CVPR3
2023 Bayesian Posterior Approximation With Stochastic Ensembles
abstract
We introduce ensembles of stochastic neural networks to approximate the Bayesian posterior, combining stochastic methods such as dropout with deep ensembles. The stochas-tic ensembles are formulated as families of distributions and trained to approximate the Bayesian posterior with variational inference. We implement stochastic ensembles based on Monte Carlo dropout, DropConnect and a novel non-parametric version of dropout and evaluate them on a toy problem and CIFAR image classification. For both tasks, we test the quality of the posteriors directly against Hamil-tonian Monte Carlo simulations. Our results show that stochastic ensembles provide more accurate posterior esti-mates than other popular baselines for Bayesian inference.
Oleksandr Balabanov, Bernhard Mehlig, Hampus Linander
CVPR3
2022 Equivariance versus Augmentation for Spherical Images
abstract
We analyze the role of rotational equivariance in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to spherical images. We compare the performance of the group equivariant networks known as S2CNNs and standard non-equivariant CNNs trained with an increasing amount of data augmentation. The chosen architectures can be considered baseline references for the respective design paradigms. Our models are trained and evaluated on single or multiple items from the MNIST- or FashionMNIST dataset projected onto the sphere. For the task of image classification, which is inherently rotationally invariant, we find that by considerably increasing the amount of data augmentation and the size of the networks, it is possible for the standard CNNs to reach at least the same performance as the equivariant network. In contrast, for the inherently equivariant task of semantic segmentation, the non-equivariant networks are consistently outperformed by the equivariant networks with significantly fewer parameters. We also analyze and compare the inference latency and training times of the different networks, enabling detailed tradeoff considerations between equivariant architectures and data augmentation for practical problems.
Jan E. Gerken, Oscar Carlsson, Hampus Linander, Fredrik Ohlsson, Christoffer Petersson, Daniel Persson
ICML3