Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gözde Özcan
dblp:283/6022
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 44% Generative modeling · 44% 3D vision · 13% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Set Functions with Implicit Differentiation · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit differentiation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Set Functions with Implicit Differentiation · AAAI 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Submodular Maximization via Online Convex Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
matroid constraint |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Submodular Maximization via Online Convex Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Submodular Maximization via Online Convex Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
online optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Submodular Maximization via Online Convex Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
online submodular maximization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Submodular Maximization via Online Convex Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Submodular Maximization via Online Convex Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning › set learning
set function learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Set Functions with Implicit Differentiation · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mean-field variational inference · 0.9implicit differentiation · 0.9fixed-point iteration · 0.9rounding schemes · 0.8regret analysis · 0.8concave relaxation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning Set Functions with Implicit DifferentiationabstractA recent work introduces the problem of learning set functions from data generated by a so-called optimal subset oracle. Their approach approximates the underlying utility function with an energy-based model, whose parameters are estimated via mean-field variational inference. This approximation reduces to fixed point iterations; however, as the number of iterations increases, automatic differentiation quickly becomes computationally prohibitive due to the size of the Jacobians that are stacked during backpropagation. We address this challenge with implicit differentiation and examine the convergence conditions for the fixed-point iterations. We empirically demonstrate the efficiency of our method on synthetic and real-world subset selection applications including product recommendation, set anomaly detection and compound selection tasks. Gözde Özcan, Chengzhi Shi, Stratis Ioannidis |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Neural Point Processes for Pixel-wise RegressionabstractWe study pixel-wise regression problems with sparsely annotated images. Traditional regression methods based on mean squared error emphasize pixels with labels, leading to distorted predictions in unlabeled areas. To address this limitation, we introduce Neural Point Processes, a novel approach that combines 2D Gaussian Processes with neural networks to leverage spatial correlations between sparse labels on images. This approach offers two key advantages: it imposes smoothness constraints on the model output and enables conditional predictions when sparse labels are available at inference time. Empirical results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate a substantial improvement in mean-squared error and $R^2$ scores, outperforming standard regression techniques. On the real-world dataset COWC, we achieve an $R^2$ of $0.769$ with $81$ out of $40,000$ ($0.2$%) points labeled, while standard regression loss (MSE) results in an $R^2$ of $0.060$. Chengzhi Shi, Gözde Özcan, Miquel Sirera, Nina Iftikhar Shamsi, Stratis Ioannidis |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2024 | Online Submodular Maximization via Online Convex OptimizationabstractWe study monotone submodular maximization under general matroid constraints in the online setting. We prove that online optimization of a large class of submodular functions, namely, threshold potential functions, reduces to online convex optimization (OCO). This is precisely because functions in this class admit a concave relaxation; as a result, OCO policies, coupled with an appropriate rounding scheme, can be used to achieve sublinear regret in the combinatorial setting. We also show that our reduction extends to many different versions of the online learning problem, including the dynamic regret, bandit, and optimistic-learning settings. Tareq Si Salem, Gözde Özcan, Iasonas Nikolaou, Evimaria Terzi, Stratis Ioannidis |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Stochastic Submodular Maximization via Polynomial Estimators
Gözde Özcan, Stratis Ioannidis |
PAKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2021 | Submodular Maximization via Taylor Series ApproximationabstractWe study submodular maximization problems with matroid constraints, in particular, problems where the objective can be expressed via compositions of analytic and multilinear functions. We show that for functions of this form, the so-called continuous greedy algorithm attains a ratio arbitrarily close to $(1-1/e) \approx 0.63$ using a deterministic estimation via Taylor series approximation. This drastically reduces execution time over prior art that uses sampling. Gözde Özcan, Armin Moharrer, Stratis Ioannidis |
SDM | 1 |