EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edwin A. Perkins
dblp:283/6801
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 67% Mathematical optimization · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
multiplicative weights update |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal anytime regret for two experts · FOCS 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal anytime regret for two experts · FOCS 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
prediction with expert advice |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimal anytime regret for two experts · FOCS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic calculus · 0.4continuous-time analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Optimal anytime regret for two expertsabstractThe multiplicative weights method is an algorithm for the problem of prediction with expert advice. It achieves the optimal regret asymptotically if the number of experts is large, and the time horizon is known in advance. Optimal algorithms are also known if there are exactly two, three or four experts, and the time horizon is known in advance. In the anytime setting, where the time horizon is not known in advance, algorithms can be obtained by the “doubling trick”, but they are not optimal, let alone practical. No minimax optimal algorithm was previously known in the anytime setting, regardless of the number of experts. We design the first minimax optimal algorithm for minimizing regret in the anytime setting. We consider the case of two experts, and prove that the optimal regret γ√t/2 is at all time steps t, where γ is a natural constant that arose 35 years ago in studying fundamental properties of Brownian motion. The algorithm is designed by considering a continuous analogue of the regret problem, which is solved using ideas from stochastic calculus. This is the extended abstract of the paper. The full paper can be found in [arXiv:2002.08994]. Nicholas J. A. Harvey, Christopher Liaw, Edwin A. Perkins, Sikander Randhawa |
FOCS | 3 |