Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Novello
dblp:283/7771
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 79% Time series and sequential data · 9% 3D vision · 9% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attribution methods |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Unlocking Feature Visualization for Deep Network with MAgnitude Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measure · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Unlocking Feature Visualization for Deep Network with MAgnitude Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measure · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robust One-Class Classification with Signed Distance Function using 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robust One-Class Classification with Signed Distance Function using 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
feature visualization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unlocking Feature Visualization for Deep Network with MAgnitude Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
one-class classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robust One-Class Classification with Signed Distance Function using 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robust One-Class Classification with Signed Distance Function using 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation › implicit surface representation
signed distance function |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robust One-Class Classification with Signed Distance Function using 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › post-hoc explanation
model-agnostic explanation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measure · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measure · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
signed distance function · 0.7phase spectrum optimization · 0.7magnitude-constrained optimization · 0.71-lipschitz neural networks · 0.7reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.6hilbert-schmidt independence criterion · 0.6ANOVA-like decomposition · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Robust One-Class Classification with Signed Distance Function using 1-Lipschitz Neural NetworksabstractWe propose a new method, dubbed One Class Signed Distance Function (OCSDF), to perform One Class Classification (OCC) by provably learning the Signed Distance Function (SDF) to the boundary of the support of any distribution. The distance to the support can be interpreted as a normality score, and its approximation using 1-Lipschitz neural networks provides robustness bounds against $l2$ adversarial attacks, an under-explored weakness of deep learning-based OCC algorithms. As a result, OCSDF comes with a new metric, certified AUROC, that can be computed at the same cost as any classical AUROC. We show that OCSDF is competitive against concurrent methods on tabular and image data while being way more robust to adversarial attacks, illustrating its theoretical properties. Finally, as exploratory research perspectives, we theoretically and empirically show how OCSDF connects OCC with image generation and implicit neural surface parametrization. Louis Béthune, Paul Novello, Guillaume Coiffier, Thibaut Boissin, Mathieu Serrurier, Quentin Vincenot, Andres Troya-Galvis |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Unlocking Feature Visualization for Deep Network with MAgnitude Constrained OptimizationabstractFeature visualization has gained significant popularity as an explainability method, particularly after the influential work by Olah et al. in 2017. Despite its success, its widespread adoption has been limited due to issues in scaling to deeper neural networks and the reliance on tricks to generate interpretable images. Here, we describe MACO, a simple approach to address these shortcomings. It consists in optimizing solely an image's phase spectrum while keeping its magnitude constant to ensure that the generated explanations lie in the space of natural images. Our approach yields significantly better results -- both qualitatively and quantitatively -- unlocking efficient and interpretable feature visualizations for state-of-the-art neural networks. We also show that our approach exhibits an attribution mechanism allowing to augment feature visualizations with spatial importance. Furthermore, we enable quantitative evaluation of feature visualizations by introducing 3 metrics: transferability, plausibility, and alignment with natural images. We validate our method on various applications and we introduce a website featuring MACO visualizations for all classes of the ImageNet dataset, which will be made available upon acceptance.
Overall, our study unlocks feature visualizations for the largest, state-of-the-art classification networks without resorting to any parametric prior image model, effectively advancing a field that has been stagnating since 2017 (Olah et al, 2017). Thomas Fel, Thibaut Boissin, Victor Boutin, Agustin M. Picard, Paul Novello, Julien Colin, Drew Linsley, Tom Rousseau, Rémi Cadène, Lore Goetschalckx, Laurent Gardes, Thomas Serre |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2022 | Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence MeasureabstractThis paper presents a new efficient black-box attribution method built on Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC). Based on Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS), HSIC measures the dependence between regions of an input image and the output of a model using the kernel embedding of their distributions. It thus provides explanations enriched by RKHS representation capabilities. HSIC can be estimated very efficiently, significantly reducing the computational cost compared to other black-box attribution methods.Our experiments show that HSIC is up to 8 times faster than the previous best black-box attribution methods while being as faithful.Indeed, we improve or match the state-of-the-art of both black-box and white-box attribution methods for several fidelity metrics on Imagenet with various recent model architectures.Importantly, we show that these advances can be transposed to efficiently and faithfully explain object detection models such as YOLOv4. Finally, we extend the traditional attribution methods by proposing a new kernel enabling an ANOVA-like orthogonal decomposition of importance scores based on HSIC, allowing us to evaluate not only the importance of each image patch but also the importance of their pairwise interactions. Our implementation is available at \url{https://github.com/paulnovello/HSIC-Attribution-Method}. Paul Novello, Thomas Fel, David Vigouroux |
NeurIPS | 1 |