Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Güner Dilsad Er
dblp:283/8078
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5317-6582ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
alternating direction method of multipliers |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distributed Event-Based Learning via ADMM · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distributed Event-Based Learning via ADMM · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distributed Event-Based Learning via ADMM · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distributed Event-Based Learning via ADMM · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
event-triggered communication · 0.9ADMM · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Distributed Event-Based Learning via ADMMabstractWe consider a distributed learning problem, where agents minimize a global objective function by exchanging information over a network. Our approach has two distinct features: (i) It substantially reduces communication by triggering communication only when necessary, and (ii) it is agnostic to the data-distribution among the different agents. We can therefore guarantee convergence even if the local data-distributions of the agents are arbitrarily distinct. We analyze the convergence rate of the algorithm both in convex and nonconvex settings and derive accelerated convergence rates in a convex setting. We also characterize the effect of communication failures and demonstrate that our algorithm is robust to communication failures. The article concludes by presenting numerical results from distributed learning tasks on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. The experiments underline communication savings of 35\% or more due to the event-based communication strategy, show resilience towards heterogeneous data-distributions, and highlight that our approach outperforms common baselines such as FedAvg, FedProx, SCAFFOLD and FedADMM. Güner Dilsad Er, Sebastian Trimpe, Michael Muehlebach |
ICML | 1 |