Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pedro P. Santos

dblp:284/0532 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4587-9528ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
1.922026
Centralized Training with Hybrid Execution in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Predictive Observation Imputation (Abstract Reprint) · AAAI 2026
Centralized training with hybrid execution in multi-agent reinforcement learning via predictive observation imputation · Artif. Intell. 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning › decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning
centralized training with decentralized execution
0.912025
Centralized training with hybrid execution in multi-agent reinforcement learning via predictive observation imputation · Artif. Intell. 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › infinite-horizon markov decision process
infinite-horizon discounted MDP
0.912025
The Number of Trials Matters in Infinite-Horizon General-Utility Markov Decision Processes · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.912025
The Number of Trials Matters in Infinite-Horizon General-Utility Markov Decision Processes · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.912025
The Number of Trials Matters in Infinite-Horizon General-Utility Markov Decision Processes · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

auto-regressive predictive model · 1.9centralized training with decentralized execution · 1.0trajectory sampling · 0.9policy evaluation · 0.9centralized training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Centralized Training with Hybrid Execution in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Predictive Observation Imputation (Abstract Reprint)
abstract
We study hybrid execution in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), a paradigm where agents aim to complete cooperative tasks with arbitrary communication levels at execution time by taking advantage of information-sharing among the agents. Under hybrid execution, the communication level can range from a setting in which no communication is allowed between agents (fully decentralized), to a setting featuring full communication (fully centralized), but the agents do not know beforehand which communication level they will encounter at execution time. We contribute MARO, an approach that makes use of an auto-regressive predictive model, trained in a centralized manner, to estimate missing agents' observations at execution time. We evaluate MARO on standard scenarios and extensions of previous benchmarks tailored to emphasize the impact of partial observability in MARL. Experimental results show that our method consistently outperforms relevant baselines, allowing agents to act with faulty communication while successfully exploiting shared information.
Pedro P. Santos, Diogo S. Carvalho, Miguel Vasco, Alberto Sardinha, Pedro Santos 0001, Ana Paiva 0001, Francisco S. Melo
AAAI1
2025 The Number of Trials Matters in Infinite-Horizon General-Utility Markov Decision Processes
abstract
The general-utility Markov decision processes (GUMDPs) framework generalizes the MDPs framework by considering objective functions that depend on the frequency of visitation of state-action pairs induced by a given policy. In this work, we contribute with the first analysis on the impact of the number of trials, i.e., the number of randomly sampled trajectories, in infinite-horizon GUMDPs. We show that, as opposed to standard MDPs, the number of trials plays a key-role in infinite-horizon GUMDPs and the expected performance of a given policy depends, in general, on the number of trials. We consider both discounted and average GUMDPs, where the objective function depends, respectively, on discounted and average frequencies of visitation of state-action pairs. First, we study policy evaluation under discounted GUMDPs, proving lower and upper bounds on the mismatch between the finite and infinite trials formulations for GUMDPs. Second, we address average GUMDPs, studying how different classes of GUMDPs impact the mismatch between the finite and infinite trials formulations. Third, we provide a set of empirical results to support our claims, highlighting how the number of trajectories and the structure of the underlying GUMDP influence policy evaluation.
Pedro P. Santos, Alberto Sardinha, Francisco S. Melo
ICML1
2025 Centralized training with hybrid execution in multi-agent reinforcement learning via predictive observation imputation
abstract
We study hybrid execution in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), a paradigm where agents aim to complete cooperative tasks with arbitrary communication levels at execution time by taking advantage of information-sharing among the agents. Under hybrid execution, the communication level can range from a setting in which no communication is allowed between agents (fully decentralized), to a setting featuring full communication (fully centralized), but the agents do not know beforehand which communication level they will encounter at execution time. We contribute MARO, an approach that makes use of an auto-regressive predictive model, trained in a centralized manner, to estimate missing agents' observations at execution time. We evaluate MARO on standard scenarios and extensions of previous benchmarks tailored to emphasize the impact of partial observability in MARL. Experimental results show that our method consistently outperforms relevant baselines, allowing agents to act with faulty communication while successfully exploiting shared information.
Pedro P. Santos, Diogo S. Carvalho, Miguel Vasco, Alberto Sardinha, Pedro Santos 0001, Ana Paiva 0001, Francisco S. Melo
Artif. Intell.1
2024 The impact of data distribution on Q-learning with function approximation
abstract
Abstract We study the interplay between the data distribution and Q-learning-based algorithms with function approximation. We provide a unified theoretical and empirical analysis as to how different properties of the data distribution influence the performance of Q-learning-based algorithms. We connect different lines of research, as well as validate and extend previous results, being primarily focused on offline settings. First, we analyze the impact of the data distribution by using optimization as a tool to better understand which data distributions yield low concentrability coefficients. We motivate high-entropy distributions from a game-theoretical point of view and propose an algorithm to find the optimal data distribution from the point of view of concentrability. Second, from an empirical perspective, we introduce a novel four-state MDP specifically tailored to highlight the impact of the data distribution in the performance of Q-learning-based algorithms with function approximation. Finally, we experimentally assess the impact of the data distribution properties on the performance of two offline Q-learning-based algorithms under different environments. Our results attest to the importance of different properties of the data distribution such as entropy, coverage, and data quality (closeness to optimal policy).
Pedro P. Santos, Diogo S. Carvalho, Alberto Sardinha, Francisco S. Melo
Mach. Learn.1