Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yechun Tang

dblp:284/0551 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 42% Information extraction and text analysis · 37% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 21%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge base question answering
complex question answering
0.612022
Improving Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Question-to-Action and Question-to-Question Alignment · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
0.612022
Improving Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Question-to-Action and Question-to-Question Alignment · EMNLP 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
knowledge base reasoning
0.612022
Improving Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Question-to-Action and Question-to-Question Alignment · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
joint entity and relation extraction
0.512021
A Trigger-Sense Memory Flow Framework for Joint Entity and Relation Extraction · WWW 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reward-guided selection · 0.6question rewriting · 0.6pre-trained language model · 0.6trigger sensor module · 0.5memory flow attention · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Improving Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Question-to-Action and Question-to-Question Alignment
abstract
Complex knowledge base question answering can be achieved by converting questions into sequences of predefined actions.However, there is a significant semantic and structural gap between natural language and action sequences, which makes this conversion difficult.In this paper, we introduce an alignment-enhanced complex question answering framework, called ALCQA, which mitigates this gap through question-to-action alignment and question-toquestion alignment.We train a question rewriting model to align the question and each action, and utilize a pretrained language model to implicitly align the question and KG artifacts.Moreover, considering that similar questions correspond to similar action sequences, we retrieve top-k similar question-answer pairs at the inference stage through question-to-question alignment and propose a novel reward-guided action sequence selection strategy to select from candidate action sequences.We conduct experiments on CQA and WQSP datasets, and the results show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods and obtains a 9.88% improvements in the F1 metric on CQA dataset.Our source code is available at https://github.com/TTTTTTTTy/ALCQA.
Yechun Tang, Xiaoxia Cheng, Weiming Lu 0001
EMNLP1
2021 Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Concept Prerequisite Relation Learning in Educational Data
abstract
Chenghao Jia, Yongliang Shen, Yechun Tang, Lu Sun, Weiming Lu. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.
Chenghao Jia, Yongliang Shen 0001, Yechun Tang, Weiming Lu 0001
NAACL-HLT3
2021 A Trigger-Sense Memory Flow Framework for Joint Entity and Relation Extraction
abstract
Joint entity and relation extraction framework constructs a unified model to perform entity recognition and relation extraction simultaneously, which can exploit the dependency between the two tasks to mitigate the error propagation problem suffered by the pipeline model. Current efforts on joint entity and relation extraction focus on enhancing the interaction between entity recognition and relation extraction through parameter sharing, joint decoding, or other ad-hoc tricks (e.g., modeled as a semi-Markov decision process, cast as a multi-round reading comprehension task). However, there are still two issues on the table. First, the interaction utilized by most methods is still weak and uni-directional, which is unable to model the mutual dependency between the two tasks. Second, relation triggers are ignored by most methods, which can help explain why humans would extract a relation in the sentence. They’re essential for relation extraction but overlooked. To this end, we present a Trigger-Sense Memory Flow Framework (TriMF) for joint entity and relation extraction. We build a memory module to remember category representations learned in entity recognition and relation extraction tasks. And based on it, we design a multi-level memory flow attention mechanism to enhance the bi-directional interaction between entity recognition and relation extraction. Moreover, without any human annotations, our model can enhance relation trigger information in a sentence through a trigger sensor module, which improves the model performance and makes model predictions with better interpretation. Experiment results show that our proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art results by improves the relation F1 to 52.44% (+3.2%) on SciERC, 66.49% (+4.9%) on ACE05, 72.35% (+0.6%) on CoNLL04 and 80.66% (+2.3%) on ADE.
Yongliang Shen 0001, Xinyin Ma, Yechun Tang, Weiming Lu 0001
WWW3