Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marcel Seelbach Benkner
dblp:284/1984
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4225-9793ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 62% Mathematical optimization · 38% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 44% Video understanding and tracking · 38% 3D vision · 18% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computing
quantum annealing |
1.8 | 3 | 2023 | QuAnt: Quantum Annealing with Learnt Couplings · ICLR 2023 CCuantuMM: Cycle-Consistent Quantum-Hybrid Matching of Multiple Shapes · CVPR 2023 Q-Match: Iterative Shape Matching via Quantum Annealing · ICCV 2021 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | CCuantuMM: Cycle-Consistent Quantum-Hybrid Matching of Multiple Shapes · CVPR 2023 Q-Match: Iterative Shape Matching via Quantum Annealing · ICCV 2021 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | CCuantuMM: Cycle-Consistent Quantum-Hybrid Matching of Multiple Shapes · CVPR 2023 Q-Match: Iterative Shape Matching via Quantum Annealing · ICCV 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
quadratic unconstrained binary optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | QuCOOP: A Versatile Framework for Solving Composite and Binary-Parametrised Problems on Quantum Annealers · CVPR 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computational models
quantum annealing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | QuCOOP: A Versatile Framework for Solving Composite and Binary-Parametrised Problems on Quantum Annealers · CVPR 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape matching
multi-shape matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CCuantuMM: Cycle-Consistent Quantum-Hybrid Matching of Multiple Shapes · CVPR 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | QuAnt: Quantum Annealing with Learnt Couplings · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Quantum Motion Segmentation · ECCV (29) 2022 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Quantum Motion Segmentation · ECCV (29) 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud registration
point set registration |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | QuCOOP: A Versatile Framework for Solving Composite and Binary-Parametrised Problems on Quantum Annealers · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantum annealing · 3.6adiabatic quantum computation · 1.7QUBO approximation · 1.7learned coupling parameters · 1.3adiabatic quantum computing · 1.3quantum computing · 1.1quadratic assignment problem · 1.0alpha-expansion · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | QuCOOP: A Versatile Framework for Solving Composite and Binary-Parametrised Problems on Quantum AnnealersabstractThere is growing interest in solving computer vision problems such as mesh or point set alignment using Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC). Unfortunately, modern experimental AQC devices such as D-Wave only support Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation (QUBO) problems, which severely limits their applicability. This paper proposes a new way to overcome this limitation and introduces QuCOOP, an optimisation framework extending the scope of AQC to composite and binary-parametrised, possibly non-quadratic problems. The key idea of QuCOOP is to iteratively approximate the original objective function by a sequel of local (intermediate) QUBO forms, whose binary parameters can be sampled on AQC devices. We experiment with quadratic assignment problems, shape matching and point set registration without knowing the correspondences in advance. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results across multiple instances of tested problems1. Natacha Kuete Meli, Vladislav Golyanik, Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Michael Möller 0001 |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2023 | CCuantuMM: Cycle-Consistent Quantum-Hybrid Matching of Multiple ShapesabstractJointly matching multiple, non-rigidly deformed 3D shapes is a challenging,$\mathcal{NP}$-hard problem. A perfect matching is necessarily cycle-consistent: Following the pairwise point correspondences along several shapes must end up at the starting vertex of the original shape. Unfortunately, existing quantum shape-matching methods do not support multiple shapes and even less cycle consistency. This paper addresses the open challenges and introduces the first quantum-hybrid approach for 3D shape multi-matching; in addition, it is also cycle-consistent. Its iterative formulation is admissible to modern adiabatic quantum hardware and scales linearly with the total number of input shapes. Both these characteristics are achieved by reducing the N-shape case to a sequence of three-shape matchings, the derivation of which is our main technical contribution. Thanks to quantum annealing, high-quality solutions with low energy are retrieved for the intermediate$\mathcal{NP}$- hard objectives. On benchmark datasets, the proposed approach significantly outperforms extensions to multi-shape matching of a previous quantum-hybrid two-shape matching method and is on-par with classical multi-matching methods. Our source code is available at 4dqv.mpiinf.mpg.de/CCuantuMM/. Harshil Bhatia, Edith Tretschk, Zorah Lähner, Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Michael Möller 0001, Christian Theobalt, Vladislav Golyanik |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2023 | QuAnt: Quantum Annealing with Learnt Couplings
Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Maximilian Krahn, Edith Tretschk, Zorah Lähner, Michael Möller 0001, Vladislav Golyanik |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Quantum Motion Segmentation
Federica Arrigoni, Willi Menapace, Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Elisa Ricci 0001, Vladislav Golyanik |
ECCV (29) | 3 |
| 2021 | Q-Match: Iterative Shape Matching via Quantum AnnealingabstractFinding shape correspondences can be formulated as an ${\mathcal{N}}{\mathcal{P}} - hard$ quadratic assignment problem (QAP) that becomes infeasible for shapes with high sampling density. A promising research direction is to tackle such quadratic optimization problems over binary variables with quantum annealing, which allows for some problems a more efficient search in the solution space. Unfortunately, enforcing the linear equality constraints in QAPs via a penalty significantly limits the success probability of such methods on currently available quantum hardware. To address this limitation, this paper proposes Q-Match, i.e., a new iterative quantum method for QAPs inspired by the α-expansion algorithm, which allows solving problems of an order of magnitude larger than current quantum methods. It implicitly enforces the QAP constraints by updating the current estimates in a cyclic fashion. Further, Q-Match can be applied iteratively, on a subset of well-chosen correspondences, al-lowing us to scale to real-world problems. Using the latest quantum annealer, the D-Wave Advantage, we evaluate the proposed method on a subset of QAPLIB as well as on isometric shape matching problems from the FAUST dataset. Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Zorah Lähner, Vladislav Golyanik, Christof Wunderlich, Christian Theobalt, Michael Möller 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2020 | Adiabatic Quantum Graph Matching with Permutation Matrix ConstraintsabstractMatching problems on 3D shapes and images are challenging as they are frequently formulated as combinatorial quadratic assignment problems (QAPs) with permutation matrix constraints, which are NP-hard. In this work, we address such problems with emerging quantum computing technology and propose several reformulations of QAPs as unconstrained problems suitable for efficient execution on quantum hardware. We investigate several ways to inject permutation matrix constraints in a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem which can be mapped to quantum hardware. We focus on obtaining a sufficient spectral gap, which further increases the probability to measure optimal solutions and valid permutation matrices in a single run. We perform our experiments on the quantum computer D-Wave 2000Q(211qubits, adiabatic). Despite the observed discrepancy between simulated adiabatic quantum computing and execution on real quantum hardware, our reformulation of permutation matrix constraints increases the robustness of the numerical computations over other penalty approaches in our experiments. The proposed algorithm has the potential to scale to higher dimensions on future quantum computing architectures, which opens up multiple new directions for solving matching problems in 3D computer vision and graphics. Marcel Seelbach Benkner, Vladislav Golyanik, Christian Theobalt, Michael Möller 0001 |
3DV | 1 |