Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abdul Rehman Anwer

dblp:284/4461 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 70% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU computing
GPU application reliability
0.412020
GPU-trident: efficient modeling of error propagation in GPU programs · SC 2020
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
silent data corruption
0.412020
GPU-trident: efficient modeling of error propagation in GPU programs · SC 2020
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.412020
GPU-trident: efficient modeling of error propagation in GPU programs · SC 2020
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault injection
0.112020
GPU-trident: efficient modeling of error propagation in GPU programs · SC 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault injection · 0.4analytical modeling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 GPU-trident: efficient modeling of error propagation in GPU programs
abstract
Fault injection (FI) techniques are typically used to determine the reliability profiles of programs under soft errors. However, these techniques are highly resource- and time-intensive. Prior research developed a model, TRIDENT to analytically predict Silent Data Corruption (SDC, i.e., incorrect output without any indication) probabilities of single-threaded CPU applications without requiring FIs. Unfortunately, TRIDENT is incompatible with GPU programs, due to their high degree of parallelism and different memory architectures than CPU programs. The main challenge is that modeling error propagation across thousands of threads in a GPU kernel requires enormous amounts of data to be profiled and analyzed, posing a major scalability bottleneck for HPC applications. In this paper, we propose GPU-TRIDENT, an accurate and scalable technique for modeling error propagation in GPU programs. We find that GPU-TRIDENT is 2 orders of magnitude faster than FI-based approaches, and nearly as accurate in determining the SDC rate of GPU programs.
Abdul Rehman Anwer, Guanpeng Li, Karthik Pattabiraman, Michael B. Sullivan 0001, Timothy Tsai 0002, Siva Kumar Sastry Hari
SC1