Stephanie Stacy

dblp:284/4488 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PETS2025: Multi-Authority Multi-Sensor Maritime Surveillance Challenge and Evaluation
abstract
This paper presents the outcomes of the PETS2025 challenge, held in conjunction with AVSS 2025 and sponsored by the EU-funded EURMARS project. The challenge introduces a novel maritime surveillance dataset comprising image sequences captured by diverse multi-altitude, multimodal sensors, reflecting the real-world multi-authority environment. The key tasks include: (1) object detection using various sensors across different platforms (ground-based and low-altitude aerial) and spectral ranges (visible, thermal, ultraviolet (UV), and short-wave infrared (SWIR)); (2) long-term tracking of targets in maritime environments spanning both sea and land; and (3) approximating target geolocations by using sensor imagery and telemetry data. Performance evaluations of results submitted by 12 international participants are discussed. The results show the effectiveness of these submissions and highlight ongoing challenges posed by heterogeneous sensors and complex environments. These challenges emphasise the need to further improve detection, tracking, and geolocation approximation for maritime and coastal surveillance.
Thanet Markchom, Jonathan N. Boyle, Lulu Chen, James M. Ferryman, Matteo Marturini, Stephan Veigl, Andreas Opitz, Andreas Kriechbaum-Zabini, Romaios Bratskas, Anastasios Gkamaris, Dimitris Papachristos, George Leventakis, Wenjun Fan, Hsiang-Wei Huang, Jeng-Neng Hwang, Pyong-Kun Kim, Kwangju Kim, Chung-I Huang, Kenta Saito, Shunta Kaneko, Kyoko Sudo, Nguyen Thanh Thien, Meng-Yu Kao, Jun-Wei Hsieh, Teepakorn Lilek, Tossapol Pomsuwan, Jinjie Gu, Tianyang Xu 0001, Xuefeng Zhu 0003, Xiaojun Wu 0001, Josef Kittler, Stephanie Stacy, Alfredo Gabaldon, Peter Tu, Dongyoung Kim, Kyoungoh Lee
AVSS32
2025 A Conceptual Approach to Explainable Object and Action Classification
abstract
The Automated Domain-Understanding and Collaborative Agency (ADUCA) system allows for the acquisition of conceptual models of both objects and actions. With exposure to a small number of training exemplars, the ADUCA system constructs a canonical model based on semantically meaningful attributes and relationships that are common to the training data. At test time, the ADUCA system is first tasked with describing an image or video in generic semantic terms which constitutes a bottom up description of the input. The ADUCA system then attempts to determine which if any of its canonical class models is most consistent with the bottom up description. When prompted, the ADUCA system can provide a grounded explanation for its decision as well as answer questions such as why a different conclusion was not drawn. When a mistake has been identified, the ADUCA system attempts to reason over why the mistake was made as well as propose how best to modify its canonical model so as to avoid making similar mistakes in the future. This allows for a form of continuous learning.
Stephanie Stacy, Alfredo Gabaldon, Guy Ben-Yosef, Idan Tankel, Marc Tomlinson, Sharon G. Small, Ting Liu 0003, Peter Tu
AVSS1
2024 Understanding the Unforeseen via the Intentional Stance
abstract
We present an architecture and system for understanding novel behaviors of an observed agent. Our approach uses analogy with past experiences to construct hypothetical rationales that attempt to explain the behavior of an observed agent. Moreover, we view analogies as partial; thus multiple past experiences can be blended to analogically explain an unforeseen event, leading to greater inferential flexibility. We argue that this approach results in more meaningful explanations of observed behavior than approaches based on surface-level comparisons. A key advantage of behavior explanation over classification is the ability to i) take appropriate responses based on reasoning and ii) make non-trivial predictions that allow for the verification of the hypothesized explanation. We provide a simple use case to demonstrate novel experience understanding through analogies in a gas station environment.
Stephanie Stacy, Alfredo Gabaldon, John N. Karigiannis, James Kubricht, Peter Tu
AVSS1
2023 Simplifying Group Communication: A Shared Agency Modeling Approach
Max Potter, Tao Gao 0004, Stephanie Stacy
CogSci3
2022 What Is the point? a Theory of Mind Model of Relevance
Stephanie Stacy, Annya L. Dahmani, Boxuan Jiang, Federico Rossano, Yixin Zhu 0001, Tao Gao 0004
CogSci2
2022 Overloaded Communication as Paternalistic Helping
Stephanie Stacy, Aishni Parab, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Tao Gao 0004
CogSci1
2022 No Such Thing as the Average Listener: Belief-driven versus Action-driven Strategies in Signaling
Stephanie Stacy, Yiling Yun, Max Potter, Naomi Moskowitz, Tao Gao 0004
CogSci1
2021 Individual vs. Joint Perception: a Pragmatic Model of Pointing as Smithian Helping
Stephanie Stacy, Adelpha Chan, Chuyu Wei, Federico Rossano, Yixin Zhu 0001, Tao Gao 0004
CogSci2
2021 Modeling Communication to Coordinate Perspectives in Cooperation
Stephanie Stacy, Chenfei Li, Minglu Zhao, Yiling Yun, Qingyi Zhao, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Tao Gao 0004
CogSci1
2020 Intuitive Signaling Through an "Imagined We'"
Stephanie Stacy, Qingyi Zhao, Minglu Zhao, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Tao Gao 0004
CogSci1
2020 Bootstrapping an Imagined We for Cooperation
Stephanie Stacy, Minglu Zhao, Gabriel Marquez, Tao Gao 0004
CogSci2