Recent research has established complexity results for the problem of deciding the existence of interpolants in logics lacking the Craig interpolation property (CIP). The proof techniques developed so far are non-constructive, and no meaningful bounds on the size of interpolants are known. Hybrid modal logics (or modal logics with nominals) are a particularly interesting class of logics without CIP: in their case, CIP cannot be restored without sacrificing decidability and, in applications, interpolants in these logics can serve as definite descriptions and separators between positive and negative data examples in description logic knowledge bases. In this contribution we show, using a new hypermosaic elimination technique, that in many standard hybrid modal logics Craig interpolants can be computed in fourfold exponential time, if they exist. On the other hand, we show that the existence of uniform interpolants is undecidable, which is in stark contrast to modal or intuitionistic logic where uniform interpolants always exist.

Modal separability for modal fixpoint formulae is the problem to decide for two given modal fixpoint formulae $φ,φ'$ whether there is a modal formula $ψ$ that separates them, in the sense that $φ\modelsψ$ and $ψ\models\negφ'$. We study modal separability and its special case modal definability over various classes of models, such as arbitrary models, finite models, trees, and models of bounded outdegree. Our main results are that modal separability is PSpace-complete over words, that is, models of outdegree $\leq 1$, ExpTime-complete over unrestricted and over binary models, and TwoExpTime-complete over models of outdegree bounded by some $d\geq 3$. Interestingly, this latter case behaves fundamentally different from the other cases also in that modal logic does not enjoy the Craig interpolation property over this class. Motivated by this we study also the induced interpolant existence problem as a special case of modal separability, and show that it is coNExpTime-complete and thus harder than validity in the logic. Besides deciding separability, we also provide algorithms for the effective construction of separators. Finally, we consider in a case study the extension of modal fixpoint formulae by graded modalities and investigate separability by modal formulae and graded modal formulae.

Modal separability for modal fixpoint formulae is the problem to decide for two given modal fixpoint formulae φ,φ' whether there is a modal formula ψ that separates them, in the sense that φ ⊧ ψ and ψ ⊧ ¬φ'. We study modal separability and its special case modal definability over various classes of models, such as arbitrary models, finite models, trees, and models of bounded outdegree. Our main results are that modal separability is PSpace-complete over words, that is, models of outdegree ≤ 1, ExpTime-complete over unrestricted and over binary models, and 2-ExpTime-complete over models of outdegree bounded by some d ≥ 3. Interestingly, this latter case behaves fundamentally different from the other cases also in that modal logic does not enjoy the Craig interpolation property over this class. Motivated by this we study also the induced interpolant existence problem as a special case of modal separability, and show that it is coNExpTime-complete and thus harder than validity in the logic. Besides deciding separability, we also investigate the problem of efficient construction of separators. Finally, we consider in a case study the extension of modal fixpoint formulae by graded modalities and investigate separability by modal formulae and graded modal formulae.

We introduce the countdown $μ$-calculus, an extension of the modal $μ$-calculus with ordinal approximations of fixpoint operators. In addition to properties definable in the classical calculus, it can express (un)boundedness properties such as the existence of arbitrarily long sequences of specific actions. The standard correspondence with parity games and automata extends to suitably defined countdown games and automata. However, unlike in the classical setting, the scalar fragment is provably weaker than the full vectorial calculus and corresponds to automata satisfying a simple syntactic condition. We establish some facts, in particular decidability of the model checking problem and strictness of the hierarchy induced by the maximal allowed nesting of our new operators.