Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maksym Yatsura

dblp:284/8781 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 72% Segmentation and scene understanding · 11% Image recognition and object detection · 8%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.732023
Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023
Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks · NeurIPS 2021
Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
1.222023
Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023
Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.712023
Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.712023
Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › physical adversarial attack
adversarial patch
0.712023
Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
black-box adversarial attack
0.512021
Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
certified defense
0.512021
Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.512021
Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.512021
Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
patch attack defense
0.512021
Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

square attack · 0.5randomized smoothing · 0.5random search · 0.5learned controller · 0.5gradient-based end-to-end training · 0.5certified defense · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation
Maksym Yatsura, Kaspar Sakmann, N. Grace Hua, Matthias Hein 0001, Jan Hendrik Metzen
ICLR1
2021 Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers
Jan Hendrik Metzen, Maksym Yatsura
ICLR2
2021 Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks
abstract
Adversarial attacks based on randomized search schemes have obtained state-of-the-art results in black-box robustness evaluation recently. However, as we demonstrate in this work, their efficiency in different query budget regimes depends on manual design and heuristic tuning of the underlying proposal distributions. We study how this issue can be addressed by adapting the proposal distribution online based on the information obtained during the attack. We consider Square Attack, which is a state-of-the-art score-based black-box attack, and demonstrate how its performance can be improved by a learned controller that adjusts the parameters of the proposal distribution online during the attack. We train the controller using gradient-based end-to-end training on a CIFAR10 model with white box access. We demonstrate that plugging the learned controller into the attack consistently improves its black-box robustness estimate in different query regimes by up to 20% for a wide range of different models with black-box access. We further show that the learned adaptation principle transfers well to the other data distributions such as CIFAR100 or ImageNet and to the targeted attack setting.
Maksym Yatsura, Jan Hendrik Metzen, Matthias Hein 0001
NeurIPS1