Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maksym Yatsura
dblp:284/8781
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 72% Segmentation and scene understanding · 11% Image recognition and object detection · 8% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023 Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks · NeurIPS 2021 Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023 Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › physical adversarial attack
adversarial patch |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
black-box adversarial attack |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
certified defense |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial Attacks · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
patch attack defense |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers · ICLR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
square attack · 0.5randomized smoothing · 0.5random search · 0.5learned controller · 0.5gradient-based end-to-end training · 0.5certified defense · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Certified Defences Against Adversarial Patch Attacks on Semantic Segmentation
Maksym Yatsura, Kaspar Sakmann, N. Grace Hua, Matthias Hein 0001, Jan Hendrik Metzen |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifiers
Jan Hendrik Metzen, Maksym Yatsura |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Meta-Learning the Search Distribution of Black-Box Random Search Based Adversarial AttacksabstractAdversarial attacks based on randomized search schemes have obtained state-of-the-art results in black-box robustness evaluation recently. However, as we demonstrate in this work, their efficiency in different query budget regimes depends on manual design and heuristic tuning of the underlying proposal distributions. We study how this issue can be addressed by adapting the proposal distribution online based on the information obtained during the attack. We consider Square Attack, which is a state-of-the-art score-based black-box attack, and demonstrate how its performance can be improved by a learned controller that adjusts the parameters of the proposal distribution online during the attack. We train the controller using gradient-based end-to-end training on a CIFAR10 model with white box access. We demonstrate that plugging the learned controller into the attack consistently improves its black-box robustness estimate in different query regimes by up to 20% for a wide range of different models with black-box access. We further show that the learned adaptation principle transfers well to the other data distributions such as CIFAR100 or ImageNet and to the targeted attack setting. Maksym Yatsura, Jan Hendrik Metzen, Matthias Hein 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |