Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Runnan Xu

dblp:284/8796 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 50% Memory systems · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
3d-stacked memory
0.912025
3D-SubG: A 3D Stacked Hybrid Processing Near/In-Memory Accelerator for Subgraph GNNs · DAC 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
graph neural network accelerator
0.912025
3D-SubG: A 3D Stacked Hybrid Processing Near/In-Memory Accelerator for Subgraph GNNs · DAC 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
in-memory computing accelerator
0.912025
3D-SubG: A 3D Stacked Hybrid Processing Near/In-Memory Accelerator for Subgraph GNNs · DAC 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.912025
3D-SubG: A 3D Stacked Hybrid Processing Near/In-Memory Accelerator for Subgraph GNNs · DAC 2025
Memory systems › processing-in-memory
near-memory processing
0.912025
3D-SubG: A 3D Stacked Hybrid Processing Near/In-Memory Accelerator for Subgraph GNNs · DAC 2025
Memory systems
processing-in-memory
0.912025
3D-SubG: A 3D Stacked Hybrid Processing Near/In-Memory Accelerator for Subgraph GNNs · DAC 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload-balanced mapping · 0.9hybrid bonding · 0.9distributed global pooling · 0.9bit-level non-zero gathering · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 3D-SubG: A 3D Stacked Hybrid Processing Near/In-Memory Accelerator for Subgraph GNNs
abstract
Subgraph Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are emerging as a promising approach to enhance GNN expressiveness, but their more complex graph structures with numerous independent and irregular subgraphs pose significant hardware deployment challenges. In this work, we propose 3D-SubG, a 3D stacked hybrid processing-near/in-memory accelerator for subgraph GNNs. With hybrid bonding packaging technology, a logic die is 3D stacked with a DRAM die for highly parallel memory accesses. The logic die employs digital SRAM-based processing-in-memory (PIM) macros to boost computation density and minimize data transfer. We further propose a bit-level non-zero gathering method to exploit graph sparsity for PIM, a workloadbalanced mapping strategy for subgraph allocation onto different logic-to-DRAM blocks, and a distributed global pooling approach to reduce inter-block data movements. Experimental results show that 3D-SubG achieves average improvements of $146.11 \times$ in performance, $934.18 \times$ in area efficiency, and $1171.80 \times$ in energy efficiency compared to RTX 3090Ti.
Guoxiang Li, Runnan Xu, Ruohang Xu, Yikan Qiu, Renati Tuerhong, Muhan Zhang, Le Ye, Yufei Ma 0002
DAC2
2025 3D-MoE: Accelerating Multi-Expert Activated LLMs on 3D In/Near-Memory Computing Architecture via Hybrid Parallelism
abstract
The Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) architecture constitutes a significant advancement in the scalability of large- language models (LLMs), achieving better performance compared to traditional dense models with the same size of activated parameters. However, the MoE models introduce two main challenges for their edge deployment: (1) increased memory storage requirements due to the sparse parameter composition and (2) aggravated yon Neumann bottleneck caused by the inherent unpredictability of dynamic expert routing. Recent trends in state-of-the-art MoE models suggest that scaling up both activated and the total number of experts leads to better model performance. However, this multi-expert activated LLM architecture further exacerbates the aforementioned issues. To address these challenges, this paper presents a 3D stacked near-DRAM computing architecture based on available hybrid bonding and mini-TSV techniques, thereby increasing both storage capacity with the same die area and memory bandwidth for MoE models. We also employ 6T-SRAM-based Digital Computing-in-Memory (DCIM) macros as the primary computing components and weight buffers to optimize the effective throughput of LLM inference. Furthermore, we propose a hybrid parallel computation scheme with Greedy-Swap Expert Grouping (GSEG) strategy. It balances the weight-parameter placement between tile groups in 3D-MoE architecture to enhance hardware utilization and overall performance. Through comprehensive benchmarking, the proposed accelerator demonstrates 143.10× and 68.89× speedup in token throughput, and 870.98× and 47.11× improvements in energy efficiency compared to CPU and GPU, respectively, confirming its advantages for multi-expert activated LLM inference.
Xinyu Qu, Runnan Xu, Yufei Ma 0002
ICCAD3