Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Georg Ahnert

dblp:284/8927 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-7286-3589ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 77% Question answering and dialogue systems · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
survey simulation
1.012026
Survey Response Generation: Generating Closed-Ended Survey Responses In-Silico with Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

restricted generation · 2.0reasoning output · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Survey Response Generation: Generating Closed-Ended Survey Responses In-Silico with Large Language Models
abstract
Many in-silico simulations of human survey responses with large language models (LLMs) focus on generating closed-ended survey responses, whereas LLMs are typically trained to generate open-ended text instead.Previous research has used a diverse range of methods for generating closed-ended survey responses with LLMs, and a standard practice remains to be identified.In this paper, we systematically investigate the impact that various Survey Response Generation Methods have on predicted survey responses.We present the results of 32 mio.simulated survey responses across 8 Survey Response Generation Methods, 4 political attitude surveys, and 10 openweight language models.We find significant differences between the Survey Response Generation Methods in both individual-level and subpopulation-level alignment.Our results show that Restricted Generation Methods perform best overall, and that reasoning output does not consistently improve alignment.Our work underlines the significant impact that Survey Response Generation Methods have on simulated survey responses, and we develop practical recommendations on the application of Survey Response Generation Methods.
Georg Ahnert, Anna-Carolina Haensch, Barbara Plank, Markus Strohmaier
ACL (1)1
2025 Extracting Affect Aggregates from Longitudinal Social Media Data with Temporal Adapters for Large Language Models
abstract
This paper proposes temporally aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) as a tool for longitudinal analysis of social media data. We fine-tune Temporal Adapters for Llama 3 8B on full timelines from a panel of British Twitter users and extract longitudinal aggregates of emotions and attitudes with established questionnaires. We focus our analysis on the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic that had a strong impact on public opinion and collective emotions. We validate our estimates against representative British survey data and find strong positive and significant correlations for several collective emotions. The estimates obtained are robust across multiple training seeds and prompt formulations, and in line with collective emotions extracted using a traditional classification model trained on labeled data. We demonstrate the flexibility of our method on questions of public opinion for which no pre-trained classifier is available. Our work extends the analysis of affect in LLMs to a longitudinal setting through Temporal Adapters. It enables flexible and new approaches to the longitudinal analysis of social media data.
Georg Ahnert, Max Pellert, David García 0001, Markus Strohmaier
ICWSM1