Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Müller 0005
dblp:284/9655 · also Samuel G. Müller, Samuel Gabriel Müller
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-0795-6097ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 24% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 50% Data mining · 50% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
prior-data fitted networks |
2.1 | 3 | 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023 PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023 Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inference · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
causal fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › causal fairness
counterfactual fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
tabular foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
temporal distribution shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning curve extrapolation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
tabular classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning and data management
automated machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Data mining
feature engineering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
automatic data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
early stopping |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentation · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.9in-context learning · 1.5bayesian inference · 1.3pre-training on synthetic data · 0.9structural causal model · 0.8prior-fitted network · 0.7prior-data fitted networks · 0.7neural processes · 0.7large language model · 0.7gaussian process · 0.7MCMC · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal FairnessabstractMachine learning (ML) systems are utilized in critical sectors such as healthcare, law enforcement, and finance, but often rely on historical data that contains demographic biases, leading to decisions that perpetuate or intensify existing inequalities. Causal and counterfactual fairness provide a transparent, human-in-the-loop framework to mitigate algorithmic discrimination, aligning closely with legal doctrines of direct and indirect discrimination. However, current causal fairness frameworks hold a key limitation in that they assume prior knowledge of the correct causal model, restricting their applicability in complex fairness scenarios where causal models are unknown or difficult to identify. To bridge this gap, we propose FairPFN, a tabular foundation model pre-trained on synthetic causal fairness data to identify and mitigate the causal effects of protected attributes in its predictions. FairPFN’s key contribution is that it requires no knowledge of the causal model and demonstrates strong performance across a diverse set of hand-crafted and real-world causal scenarios relative to robust baseline methods. FairPFN paves the way for a promising direction for future research, making causal fairness more accessible to a wider variety of complex fairness problems. Jake Robertson, Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Noor H. Awad, Frank Hutter |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular DataabstractWhile most ML models expect independent and identically distributed data, this assumption is often violated in real-world scenarios due to distribution shifts, resulting in the degradation of machine learning model performance. Until now, no tabular method has consistently outperformed classical supervised learning, which ignores these shifts. To address temporal distribution shifts, we present Drift-Resilient TabPFN, a fresh approach based on In-Context Learning with a Prior-Data Fitted Network that learns the learning algorithm itself: it accepts the entire training dataset as input and makes predictions on the test set in a single forward pass. Specifically, it learns to approximate Bayesian inference on synthetic datasets drawn from a prior that specifies the model's inductive bias. This prior is based on structural causal models (SCM), which gradually shift over time. To model shifts of these causal models, we use a secondary SCM, that specifies changes in the primary model parameters. The resulting Drift-Resilient TabPFN can be applied to unseen data, runs in seconds on small to moderately sized datasets and needs no hyperparameter tuning. Comprehensive evaluations across 18 synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate large performance improvements over a wide range of baselines, such as XGB, CatBoost, TabPFN, and applicable methods featured in the Wild-Time benchmark. Compared to the strongest baselines, it improves accuracy from 0.688 to 0.744 and ROC AUC from 0.786 to 0.832 while maintaining stronger calibration. This approach could serve as significant groundwork for further research on out-of-distribution prediction. Kai Helli, David Schnurr, Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second
Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Katharina Eggensperger, Frank Hutter |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian OptimizationabstractIn this paper, we use Prior-data Fitted Networks (PFNs) as a flexible surrogate for Bayesian Optimization (BO). PFNs are neural processes that are trained to approximate the posterior predictive distribution (PPD) through in-context learning on any prior distribution that can be efficiently sampled from. We describe how this flexibility can be exploited for surrogate modeling in BO. We use PFNs to mimic a naive Gaussian process (GP), an advanced GP, and a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN). In addition, we show how to incorporate further information into the prior, such as allowing hints about the position of optima (user priors), ignoring irrelevant dimensions, and performing non-myopic BO by learning the acquisition function. The flexibility underlying these extensions opens up vast possibilities for using PFNs for BO. We demonstrate the usefulness of PFNs for BO in a large-scale evaluation on artificial GP samples and three different hyperparameter optimization testbeds: HPO-B, Bayesmark, and PD1. We publish code alongside trained models at https://github.com/automl/PFNs4BO. Samuel Müller 0005, Matthias Feurer 0001, Noah Hollmann, Frank Hutter |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted NetworksabstractLearning curve extrapolation aims to predict model performance in later epochs of training, based on the performance in earlier epochs.
In this work, we argue that, while the inherent uncertainty in the extrapolation of learning curves warrants a Bayesian approach, existing methods are (i) overly restrictive, and/or (ii) computationally expensive. We describe the first application of prior-data fitted neural networks (PFNs) in this context. A PFN is a transformer, pre-trained on data generated from a prior, to perform approximate Bayesian inference in a single forward pass. We propose LC-PFN, a PFN trained to extrapolate 10 million artificial right-censored learning curves generated from a parametric prior proposed in prior art using MCMC. We demonstrate that LC-PFN can approximate the posterior predictive distribution more accurately than MCMC, while being over 10 000 times faster. We also show that the same LC-PFN achieves competitive performance extrapolating a total of 20 000 real learning curves from four learning curve benchmarks (LCBench, NAS-Bench-201, Taskset, and PD1) that stem from training a wide range of model architectures (MLPs, CNNs, RNNs, and Transformers) on 53 different datasets with varying input modalities (tabular, image, text, and protein data). Finally, we investigate its potential in the context of model selection and find that a simple LC-PFN based predictive early stopping criterion obtains 2 - 6x speed-ups on 45 of these datasets, at virtually no overhead. Steven Adriaensen, Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Samuel Müller 0005, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature EngineeringabstractAs the field of automated machine learning (AutoML) advances, it becomes increasingly important to incorporate domain knowledge into these systems.
We present an approach for doing so by harnessing the power of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we introduce Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineering (CAAFE), a feature engineering method for tabular datasets that utilizes an LLM to iteratively generate additional semantically meaningful features for tabular datasets based on the description of the dataset. The method produces both Python code for creating new features and explanations for the utility of the generated features.
Despite being methodologically simple, CAAFE improves performance on 11 out of 14 datasets -- boosting mean ROC AUC performance from 0.798 to 0.822 across all dataset - similar to the improvement achieved by using a random forest instead of logistic regression on our datasets. Furthermore, CAAFE is interpretable by providing a textual explanation for each generated feature.
CAAFE paves the way for more extensive semi-automation in data science tasks and emphasizes the significance of context-aware solutions that can extend the scope of AutoML systems to semantic AutoML. We release our [code](url{https://github.com/automl/CAAFE), a simple [demo](url{https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1mCA8xOAJZ4MaB_alZvyARTMjhl6RZf0a) and a [python package](url{https://pypi.org/project/caafe/). Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inference
Samuel Müller 0005, Noah Hollmann, Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Josif Grabocka, Frank Hutter |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data AugmentationabstractAutomatic augmentation methods have recently become a crucial pillar for strong model performance in vision tasks. While existing automatic augmentation methods need to trade off simplicity, cost and performance, we present a most simple baseline, TrivialAugment, that outperforms previous methods for almost free. TrivialAugment is parameter-free and only applies a single augmentation to each image. Thus, TrivialAugment's effectiveness is very unexpected to us and we performed very thorough experiments to study its performance. First, we compare TrivialAugment to previous state-of-the-art methods in a variety of image classification scenarios. Then, we perform multiple ablation studies with different augmentation spaces, augmentation methods and setups to understand the crucial requirements for its performance. Additionally, we provide a simple interface to facilitate the widespread adoption of automatic augmentation methods, as well as our full code base for reproducibility1. Since our work reveals a stagnation in many parts of automatic augmentation research, we end with a short proposal of best practices for sustained future progress in automatic augmentation methods. Samuel Müller 0005, Frank Hutter |
ICCV | 1 |