Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

J. W. Miernik

dblp:285/1368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 77% Distributed systems · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed system evaluation
distributed application performance
0.011988
Throughput of stochastic rendezvous networks with caller-specific service and processor contention · INFOCOM 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

timed petri nets · 0.0iterative approximation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 Throughput of stochastic rendezvous networks with caller-specific service and processor contention
abstract
Stochastic rendezvous networks (SRVN) are models for the throughput of distributed programs executed concurrently and synchronously on distributed computing nodes. Server tasks respond to requests from user tasks and execute in a two-phase pattern (in-rendezvous phase, then postrendezvous phase), and may themselves act as user tasks to further servers, to any depth. The authors extend the model to permit the execution time and the occurrence of nested rendezvous calls to depend on the identity of the calling user task. An iterative approximation method is developed, and compared to exact throughput calculations found with timed Petri nets. The approximation has errors of a few percent in most cases, and executes very much faster than the Petri-net calculation.>
J. W. Miernik, C. Murray Woodside, John E. Neilson, Dorina C. Petriu
INFOCOM1