Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jenny Seidenschwarz

dblp:285/4712 · also Jenny Denise Seidenschwarz · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8955-0767ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
3D vision · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% Image recognition and object detection · 17%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
person re-identification
1.322023
The Group Loss++: A Deeper Look Into Group Loss for Deep Metric Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Simple Cues Lead to a Strong Multi-Object Tracker · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
deep metric learning
1.222023
The Group Loss++: A Deeper Look Into Group Loss for Deep Metric Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Learning Intra-Batch Connections for Deep Metric Learning · ICML 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image retrieval
0.822023
The Group Loss++: A Deeper Look Into Group Loss for Deep Metric Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Learning Intra-Batch Connections for Deep Metric Learning · ICML 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
0.812024
SeMoLi: What Moves Together Belongs Together · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › point cloud object detection
LiDAR-based 3D object detection
0.812024
SeMoLi: What Moves Together Belongs Together · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
scene flow estimation
0.812024
SeMoLi: What Moves Together Belongs Together · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
semi-supervised object detection
0.812024
SeMoLi: What Moves Together Belongs Together · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design
0.712023
The Group Loss++: A Deeper Look Into Group Loss for Deep Metric Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning
0.712023
The Group Loss++: A Deeper Look Into Group Loss for Deep Metric Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking
0.712023
Simple Cues Lead to a Strong Multi-Object Tracker · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › multi-object tracking
tracking-by-detection
0.712023
Simple Cues Lead to a Strong Multi-Object Tracker · CVPR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

message passing networks · 1.3scene flow · 0.8correlation clustering · 0.8re-identification network · 0.7motion model · 0.7label propagation · 0.7deep metric learning · 0.7attention mechanism · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DynOMo: Online Point Tracking by Dynamic Online Monocular Gaussian Reconstruction
abstract
Reconstructing scenes and tracking motion are two sides of the same coin. Tracking points allow for geometric reconstruction [13], while geometric reconstruction of (dynamic) scenes allows for 3D tracking of points over time [22], [36]. The latter was recently also exploited for 2D point tracking to overcome occlusion ambiguities by lifting tracking directly into 3D [35]. However, above approaches either require offline processing or multi-view camera setups both unrealistic for real-world applications like robot navigation or mixed reality. We target the challenge of online 2D and 3D point tracking from unposed monocular camera input introducing Dynamic Online Monocular Reconstruction (DynOMo). We leverage 3D Gaussian splatting to reconstruct dynamic scenes in an online fashion. Our approach extends 3D Gaussians to capture new content and object motions while estimating camera movements from a single RGB frame. DynOMo stands out by enabling emergence of point trajectories through robust image feature reconstruction and a novel similarity-enhanced regularization term, without requiring any correspondence-level supervision. It sets the first baseline for online point tracking with monocular unposed cameras, achieving performance on par with existing methods. We aim to inspire the community to advance online point tracking and reconstruction, expanding the applicability to diverse real-world scenarios.
Jenny Seidenschwarz, Qunjie Zhou, Bardienus Pieter Duisterhof, Deva Ramanan, Laura Leal-Taixé
3DV1
2024 SeMoLi: What Moves Together Belongs Together
abstract
We tackle semi-supervised object detection based on motion cues. Recent results suggest that heuristic-based clustering methods in conjunction with object trackers can be used to pseudo-label instances of moving objects and use these as supervisory signals to train 3D object detectors in Lidar data without manual supervision. We re-think this approach and suggest that both, object detection, as well as motion-inspired pseudo-labeling, can be tackled in a data-driven manner. We leverage recent advances in scene flow estimation to obtain point trajectories from which we extract long-term, class-agnostic motion patterns. Revisiting correlation clustering in the context of message passing networks, we learn to group those motion patterns to cluster points to object instances. By estimating the full extent of the objects, we obtain per-scan 3D bounding boxes that we use to supervise a Lidar object detection network. Our method not only outperforms prior heuristic-based approaches (57.5 AP, + 14 improvement over prior work), more importantly, we show we can pseudo-label and train object detectors across datasets.
Jenny Seidenschwarz, Aljosa Osep, Francesco Ferroni, Simon Lucey, Laura Leal-Taixé
CVPR1
2023 Simple Cues Lead to a Strong Multi-Object Tracker
abstract
For a long time, the most common paradigm in Multi-Object Tracking was tracking-by-detection (TbD), where objects are first detected and then associated over video frames. For association, most models resourced to motion and appearance cues, e.g., re-identification networks. Recent approaches based on attention propose to learn the cues in a data-driven manner, showing impressive results. In this paper, we ask ourselves whether simple good old TbD methods are also capable of achieving the performance of end-to-end models. To this end, we propose two key ingredients that allow a standard re-identification network to excel at appearance-based tracking. We extensively analyse its failure cases, and show that a combination of our appearance features with a simple motion model leads to strong tracking results. Our tracker generalizes to four public datasets, namely MOT17, MOT20, BDD100k, and DanceTrack, achieving state-of-the-art performance. https://github.com/dvl-tum/GHOST.
Jenny Seidenschwarz, Guillem Brasó, Victor Castro Serrano, Ismail Elezi, Laura Leal-Taixé
CVPR1
2023 The Group Loss++: A Deeper Look Into Group Loss for Deep Metric Learning
abstract
Deep metric learning has yielded impressive results in tasks such as clustering and image retrieval by leveraging neural networks to obtain highly discriminative feature embeddings, which can be used to group samples into different classes. Much research has been devoted to the design of smart loss functions or data mining strategies for training such networks. Most methods consider only pairs or triplets of samples within a mini-batch to compute the loss function, which is commonly based on the distance between embeddings. We propose Group Loss, a loss function based on a differentiable label-propagation method that enforces embedding similarity across all samples of a group while promoting, at the same time, low-density regions amongst data points belonging to different groups. Guided by the smoothness assumption that "similar objects should belong to the same group", the proposed loss trains the neural network for a classification task, enforcing a consistent labelling amongst samples within a class. We design a set of inference strategies tailored towards our algorithm, named Group Loss++ that further improve the results of our model. We show state-of-the-art results on clustering and image retrieval on four retrieval datasets, and present competitive results on two person re-identification datasets, providing a unified framework for retrieval and re-identification.
Ismail Elezi, Jenny Seidenschwarz, Laurin Wagner, Sebastiano Vascon, Alessandro Torcinovich, Marcello Pelillo, Laura Leal-Taixé
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2021 Learning Intra-Batch Connections for Deep Metric Learning
abstract
The goal of metric learning is to learn a function that maps samples to a lower-dimensional space where similar samples lie closer than dissimilar ones. Particularly, deep metric learning utilizes neural networks to learn such a mapping. Most approaches rely on losses that only take the relations between pairs or triplets of samples into account, which either belong to the same class or two different classes. However, these methods do not explore the embedding space in its entirety. To this end, we propose an approach based on message passing networks that takes all the relations in a mini-batch into account. We refine embedding vectors by exchanging messages among all samples in a given batch allowing the training process to be aware of its overall structure. Since not all samples are equally important to predict a decision boundary, we use an attention mechanism during message passing to allow samples to weigh the importance of each neighbor accordingly. We achieve state-of-the-art results on clustering and image retrieval on the CUB-200-2011, Cars196, Stanford Online Products, and In-Shop Clothes datasets. To facilitate further research, we make available the code and the models at https://github.com/dvl-tum/intra_batch_connections.
Jenny Seidenschwarz, Ismail Elezi, Laura Leal-Taixé
ICML1