Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric D. Langlois 0002

dblp:285/4728-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Reinforcement learning · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
asymptotic analysis
0.512021
How RL Agents Behave When Their Actions Are Modified · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.512021
Agent Incentives: A Causal Perspective · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.112021
Agent Incentives: A Causal Perspective · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graphical criteria · 0.5causal influence diagrams · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Incentives for responsiveness, instrumental control and impact
Ryan Carey, Eric D. Langlois 0002, Chris van Merwijk, Shane Legg, Tom Everitt
Artif. Intell.2
2021 Agent Incentives: A Causal Perspective
abstract
We present a framework for analysing agent incentives using causal influence diagrams. We establish that a well-known criterion for value of information is complete. We propose a new graphical criterion for value of control, establishing its soundness and completeness. We also introduce two new concepts for incentive analysis: response incentives indicate which changes in the environment affect an optimal decision, while instrumental control incentives establish whether an agent can influence its utility via a variable X. For both new concepts, we provide sound and complete graphical criteria. We show by example how these results can help with evaluating the safety and fairness of an AI system
Tom Everitt, Ryan Carey, Eric D. Langlois 0002, Pedro A. Ortega, Shane Legg
AAAI3
2021 How RL Agents Behave When Their Actions Are Modified
abstract
Reinforcement learning in complex environments may require supervision to prevent the agent from attempting dangerous actions. As a result of supervisor intervention, the executed action may differ from the action specified by the policy. How does this affect learning? We present the Modified-Action Markov Decision Process, an extension of the MDP model that allows actions to differ from the policy. We analyze the asymptotic behaviours of common reinforcement learning algorithms in this setting and show that they adapt in different ways: some completely ignore modifications while others go to various lengths in trying to avoid action modifications that decrease reward. By choosing the right algorithm, developers can prevent their agents from learning to circumvent interruptions or constraints, and better control agent responses to other kinds of action modification, like self-damage.
Eric D. Langlois 0002, Tom Everitt
AAAI1