Computing geometric representations of data is a cornerstone of modern machine learning, typically achieved by training dual encoders which map queries and documents into a shared embedding space. Recent work of You et al. [NeurIPS ’25] has extended this approach to hierarchical retrieval, where relevance is determined by the ancestor-descendant relationships in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). While previous work has shown that valid embeddings exist when the number of descendants is small, these bounds degrade significantly for deep hierarchies, requiring dimensions as large as the total number of nodes. In this paper, we investigate compact reachability embeddings for more general graph classes and provide theoretical guarantees for representing hierarchies using embeddings whose dimension depends on structural graph parameters. We prove that for any directed tree, there exists a reachability embedding in constant dimension 3, independent of the tree’s size or depth. We generalize this result to graphs characterized by treewidth $t$, constructing embeddings of dimension $O(t \log n)$, where $n$ is the number of nodes. Complementing these upper bounds, we provide matching or near-matching lower bounds, showing that dimension $\Omega(n)$ is necessary for general DAGs and $\Omega(t / \log(n/t))$ is required for graphs of treewidth $t$. We also obtain upper and lower bounds parameterized by the number of cross-edges in the DAG. We additionally show that our embeddings can be constructed on real-world datasets, and that they give much smaller dimensions in high recall regimes compared to prior embeddings with theoretical guarantees.

Nearest neighbor search is a fundamental data structure problem with many applications. Although the main objective of the data structure is to quickly report data points that are closest to a given query, it has long been noted that without additional constraints the reported answers can be redundant and/or duplicative. This issue is typically addressed in two stages: in the first stage, the algorithm retrieves a (large) number $r$ of points closest to the query, while in the second stage, the $r$ points are post-processed and a small subset is selected to maximize the desired diversity objective. Although popular, this method suffers from a fundamental efficiency bottleneck, as the set of points retrieved in the first stage often needs to be much larger than the final output. In this paper we present provably efficient algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor search with diversity constraints that bypass this two stage process. Our algorithms are based on popular graph-based methods, which allows us to ``piggy-back'' on the existing efficient implementations. These are the first graph-based algorithms for nearest neighbor search with diversity constraints. For data sets with low intrinsic dimension, our data structures report a diverse set of $k$ points approximately closest to the query, in time that only depends on $k$ and $\log \Delta$, where $\Delta$ is the ratio of the diameter to the closest pair distance in the data set. This bound is qualitatively similar to the best known bounds for standard (non-diverse) graph-based algorithms. Our experiments show that the search time of our algorithms is substantially lower than that using the standard two-stage approach.

Contradiction retrieval refers to identifying and extracting documents that explicitly disagree with or refute the content of a query, which is important to many downstream applications like fact checking and data cleaning. To retrieve contradiction argument to the query from large document corpora, existing methods such as similarity search and cross-encoder models exhibit different limitations. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel approach: SparseCL that leverages specially trained sentence embeddings designed to preserve subtle, contradictory nuances between sentences. Our method utilizes a combined metric of cosine similarity and a sparsity function to efficiently identify and retrieve documents that contradict a given query. This approach dramatically enhances the speed of contradiction detection by reducing the need for exhaustive document comparisons to simple vector calculations. We conduct contradiction retrieval experiments on Arguana, MSMARCO, and HotpotQA, where our method produces an average improvement of $11.0%$ across different models. We also validate our method on downstream tasks like natural language inference and cleaning corrupted corpora. This paper outlines a promising direction for non-similarity-based information retrieval which is currently underexplored.

We study the density estimation problem defined as follows: given $k$ distributions $p_1, \ldots, p_k$ over a discrete domain $[n]$, as well as a collection of samples chosen from a "query" distribution $q$ over $[n]$, output $p_i$ that is "close" to $q$. Recently Aamand et al. gave the first and only known result that achieves sublinear bounds in both the sampling complexity and the query time while preserving polynomial data structure space. However, their improvement over linear samples and time is only by subpolynomial factors. Our main result is a lower bound showing that, for a broad class of data structures, their bounds cannot be significantly improved. In particular, if an algorithm uses $O(n/\log^c k)$ samples for some constant $c>0$ and polynomial space, then the query time of the data structure must be at least $k^{1-O(1)/\log \log k}$, i.e., close to linear in the number of distributions $k$. This is a novel statistical-computational trade-off for density estimation, demonstrating that any data structure must use close to a linear number of samples or take close to linear query time. The lower bound holds even in the realizable case where $q=p_i$ for some $i$, and when the distributions are flat (specifically, all distributions are uniform over half of the domain $[n]$). We also give a simple data structure for our lower bound instance with asymptotically matching upper bounds. Experiments show that the data structure is quite efficient in practice.

Generative modeling has been the dominant approach for large-scale pretraining and zeroshot generalization.In this work, we challenge this convention by showing that discriminative approaches perform substantially better than generative ones on a large number of NLP tasks.Technically, we train a single discriminator to predict whether a text sample comes from the true data distribution, similar to GANs.Since many NLP tasks can be formulated as selecting from a few options, we use this discriminator to predict the concatenation of input and which option has the highest probability of coming from the true data distribution.This simple formulation achieves state-of-theart zero-shot results on the T0 benchmark, outperforming T0 by 16.0%, 7.8%, and 11.5% respectively on different scales.In the finetuning setting, our approach also achieves new stateof-the-art results on a wide range of NLP tasks, with only 1/4 parameters of previous methods.Meanwhile, our approach requires minimal prompting efforts, which largely improves robustness and is essential for real-world applications.Furthermore, we also jointly train a generalized UD in combination with generative tasks, which maintains its advantage on discriminative tasks and simultaneously works on generative tasks.

Graph-based approaches to nearest neighbor search are popular and powerful tools for handling large datasets in practice, but they have limited theoretical guarantees. We study the worst-case performance of recent graph-based approximate nearest neighbor search algorithms, such as HNSW, NSG and DiskANN. For DiskANN, we show that its "slow preprocessing'' version provably supports approximate nearest neighbor search query with constant approximation ratio and poly-logarithmic query time, on data sets with bounded "intrinsic'' dimension. For the other data structure variants studied, including DiskANN with "fast preprocessing'', HNSW and NSG, we present a family of instances on which the empirical query time required to achieve a "reasonable'' accuracy is linear in instance size. For example, for DiskANN, we show that the query procedure can take at least $0.1 n$ steps on instances of size $n$ before it encounters any of the $5$ nearest neighbors of the query.

A* is a classic and popular method for graphs search and path finding. It assumes the existence of a heuristic function $h(u,t)$ that estimates the shortest distance from any input node $u$ to the destination $t$. Traditionally, heuristics have been handcrafted by domain experts. However, over the last few years, there has been a growing interest in learning heuristic functions. Such learned heuristics estimate the distance between given nodes based on "features" of those nodes. In this paper we formalize and initiate the study of such feature-based heuristics. In particular, we consider heuristics induced by norm embeddings and distance labeling schemes, and provide lower bounds for the tradeoffs between the number of dimensions or bits used to represent each graph node, and the running time of the A* algorithm. We also show that, under natural assumptions, our lower bounds are almost optimal.

This paper presents a new model-free algorithm for episodic finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes (MDP), Adaptive Multi-step Bootstrap (AMB), which enjoys a stronger gap-dependent regret bound. The first innovation is to estimate the optimal $Q$-function by combining an optimistic bootstrap with an adaptive multi-step Monte Carlo rollout. The second innovation is to select the action with the largest confidence interval length among admissible actions that are not dominated by any other actions. We show when each state has a unique optimal action, AMB achieves a gap-dependent regret bound that only scales with the sum of the inverse of the sub-optimality gaps. In contrast, Simchowitz and Jamieson (2019) showed all upper-confidence-bound (UCB) algorithms suffer an additional $\Omega\left(\frac{S}{\Delta_{min}}\right)$ regret due to over-exploration where $\Delta_{min}$ is the minimum sub-optimality gap and $S$ is the number of states. We further show that for general MDPs, AMB suffers an additional $\frac{|Z_{mul}|}{\Delta_{min}}$ regret, where $Z_{mul}$ is the set of state-action pairs $(s,a)$s satisfying $a$ is a non-unique optimal action for $s$. We complement our upper bound with a lower bound showing the dependency on $\frac{|Z_{mul}|}{\Delta_{min}}$ is unavoidable for any consistent algorithm. This lower bound also implies a separation between reinforcement learning and contextual bandits.

We consider the stochastic combinatorial semi-bandit problem with adversarial corruptions. We provide a simple combinatorial algorithm that can achieve a regret of $\tilde{O}\left(C+d^2K/\Delta_{min}\right)$ where $C$ is the total amount of corruptions, $d$ is the maximal number of arms one can play in each round, $K$ is the number of arms. If one selects only one arm in each round, we achieves a regret of $\tilde{O}\left(C+\sum_{\Delta_i>0}(1/\Delta_i)\right)$. Our algorithm is combinatorial and improves on the previous combinatorial algorithm by [Gupta et al., COLT2019] (their bound is $\tilde{O}\left(KC+\sum_{\Delta_i>0}(1/\Delta_i)\right)$), and almost matches the best known bounds obtained by [Zimmert et al., ICML2019] and [Zimmert and Seldin, AISTATS2019] (up to logarithmic factor). Note that the algorithms in [Zimmert et al., ICML2019] and [Zimmert and Seldin, AISTATS2019] require one to solve complex convex programs while our algorithm is combinatorial, very easy to implement, requires weaker assumptions and has very low oracle complexity and running time. We also study the setting where we only get access to an approximation oracle for the stochastic combinatorial semi-bandit problem. Our algorithm achieves an (approximation) regret bound of $\tilde{O}\left(d\sqrt{KT}\right)$. Our algorithm is very simple, only worse than the best known regret bound by $\sqrt{d}$, and has much lower oracle complexity than previous work.