Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zheyang Xiong
dblp:285/5146
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 56% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Everything Everywhere All at Once: LLMs can In-Context Learn Multiple Tasks in Superposition · ICML 2025 Can Mamba Learn How To Learn? A Comparative Study on In-Context Learning Tasks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Artificial Needles to Real Haystacks: Improving Retrieval Capabilities in LLMs by Finetuning on Synthetic Data · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization
long-context modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Artificial Needles to Real Haystacks: Improving Retrieval Capabilities in LLMs by Finetuning on Synthetic Data · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model fine-tuning
synthetic data fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Artificial Needles to Real Haystacks: Improving Retrieval Capabilities in LLMs by Finetuning on Synthetic Data · ICLR 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing › text-guided image editing
instruction-based image editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OmniEdit: Building Image Editing Generalist Models Through Specialist Supervision · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hybrid architecture |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Can Mamba Learn How To Learn? A Comparative Study on In-Context Learning Tasks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Can Mamba Learn How To Learn? A Comparative Study on In-Context Learning Tasks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | OmniEdit: Building Image Editing Generalist Models Through Specialist Supervision · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 1.7specialist model distillation · 1.7large multimodal model supervision · 1.7importance sampling · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7task vectors · 0.9superposition · 0.9state space model · 0.8attention mechanism · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | OmniEdit: Building Image Editing Generalist Models Through Specialist SupervisionabstractInstruction-guided image editing methods have demonstrated significant potential by training diffusion models on automatically synthesized or manually annotated image editing pairs. However, these methods remain far from practical, real-life applications. We identify three primary challenges contributing to this gap. Firstly, existing models have limited editing skills due to the biased synthesis process. Secondly, these methods are trained with datasets with a high volume of noise and artifacts. This is due to the application of simple filtering methods like CLIP-score. Thirdly, all these datasets are restricted to a single low resolution and fixed aspect ratio, limiting the versatility to handle real-world use cases.
In this paper, we present OmniEdit, which is an omnipotent editor to handle seven different image editing tasks with any aspect ratio seamlessly. Our contribution is in four folds: (1) OmniEdit is trained by utilizing the supervision from seven different specialist models to ensure task coverage. (2) we utilize importance sampling based on the scores provided by large multimodal models (like GPT-4o) instead of CLIP-score to improve the data quality. (3) we propose a new editing architecture called EditNet to greatly boost the editing success rate, (4) we provide images with different aspect ratios to ensure that our model can handle any image in the wild. We have curated a test set containing images of different aspect ratios, accompanied by diverse instructions to cover different tasks. Both automatic evaluation and human evaluations demonstrate that OmniEdit can significantly outperforms all the existing models. Cong Wei 0001, Zheyang Xiong, Weiming Ren, Xeron Du, Ge Zhang 0009, Wenhu Chen |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | From Artificial Needles to Real Haystacks: Improving Retrieval Capabilities in LLMs by Finetuning on Synthetic DataabstractRecent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to accurately retrieve information and maintain reasoning capabilities when processing long-context inputs. To address these limitations, we propose a finetuning approach utilizing a carefully designed synthetic dataset comprising numerical key-value retrieval tasks. Our experiments on models like GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral 7B demonstrate that finetuning LLMs on this dataset significantly improves LLMs' information retrieval and reasoning capabilities in longer-context settings. We present an analysis of the finetuned models, illustrating the transfer of skills from synthetic to real task evaluations (e.g., $10.5\%$ improvement on $20$ documents MDQA at position $10$ for GPT-3.5 Turbo). We also find that finetuned LLMs' performance on general benchmarks remains almost constant while LLMs finetuned on other baseline long-context augmentation data can encourage hallucination (e.g., on TriviaQA, Mistral 7B finetuned on our synthetic data cause no performance drop while other baseline data can cause a drop that ranges from $2.33\%$ to $6.19\%$). Our study highlights the potential of finetuning on synthetic data for improving the performance of LLMs on longer-context tasks. Zheyang Xiong, Vasilis Papageorgiou, Kangwook Lee 0001, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Everything Everywhere All at Once: LLMs can In-Context Learn Multiple Tasks in SuperpositionabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable in-context learning (ICL) capabilities. In this study, we explore a surprising phenomenon related to ICL: LLMs can perform multiple, computationally distinct ICL tasks simultaneously, during a single inference call, a capability we term task superposition". We provide empirical evidence of this phenomenon across various LLM families and scales and show that this phenomenon emerges even if we train the model to in-context learn one task at a time. We offer theoretical explanations that this capability is well within the expressive power of transformers. We also explore how LLMs internally compose task vectors during superposition. Furthermore, we show that larger models can solve more ICL tasks in parallel, and better calibrate their output distribution. Our findings offer insights into the latent capabilities of LLMs, further substantiate the perspective of "LLMs as superposition of simulators", and raise questions about the mechanisms enabling simultaneous task execution. Zheyang Xiong, Ziyang Cai, John Cooper, Albert Ge, Vasilis Papageorgiou, Zack Sifakis, Angeliki Giannou, Ziqian Lin, Liu Yang 0001, Grigorios Chrysos 0002, Samet Oymak, Kangwook Lee 0001, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Can Mamba Learn How To Learn? A Comparative Study on In-Context Learning TasksabstractState-space models (SSMs), such as Mamba (Gu & Dao, 2023), have been proposed as alternatives to Transformer networks in language modeling, incorporating gating, convolutions, and input-dependent token selection to mitigate the quadratic cost of multi-head attention. Although SSMs exhibit competitive performance, their in-context learning (ICL) capabilities, a remarkable emergent property of modern language models that enables task execution without parameter optimization, remain less explored compared to Transformers. In this study, we evaluate the ICL performance of SSMs, focusing on Mamba, against Transformer models across various tasks. Our results show that SSMs perform comparably to Transformers in standard regression ICL tasks, while outperforming them in tasks like sparse parity learning. However, SSMs fall short in tasks involving non-standard retrieval functionality. To address these limitations, we introduce a hybrid model, MambaFormer, that combines Mamba with attention blocks, surpassing individual models in tasks where they struggle independently. Our findings suggest that hybrid architectures offer promising avenues for enhancing ICL in language models. Jaeseung Park, Zheyang Xiong, Jaewoong Cho, Samet Oymak, Kangwook Lee 0001, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with ε-perturbation
Zheyang Xiong, Fangshuo Liao, Anastasios Kyrillidis |
AISTATS | 1 |