Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Norm Zhou

dblp:285/5367 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
machine learning platform
0.612022
Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions · KDD 2022
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization
0.212022
Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions · KDD 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

causal inference · 0.6bayesian optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Personalization for web-based services using offline reinforcement learning
Pavlos Athanasios Apostolopoulos, Hanson Wang, Tenghyu Xu, Chad Zhou, Kittipat Virochsiri, Norm Zhou, Igor L. Markov
Mach. Learn.7
2022 Looper: An End-to-End ML Platform for Product Decisions
abstract
Modern software systems and products increasingly rely on machine learning models to make data-driven decisions based on interactions with users, infrastructure and other systems. For broader adoption, this practice must (i) accommodate product engineers without ML backgrounds, (ii) support finegrain product-metric evaluation and (iii) optimize for product goals. To address shortcomings of prior platforms, we introduce general principles for and the architecture of an ML platform, Looper, with simple APIs for decision-making and feedback collection. Looper covers the end-to-end ML lifecycle from collecting training data and model training to deployment and inference, and extends support to personalization, causal evaluation with heterogenous treatment effects, and Bayesian tuning for product goals. During the 2021 production deployment, Looper simultaneously hosted 440-1,000 ML models that made 4-6 million real-time decisions per second. We sum up experiences of platform adopters and describe their learning curve.
Igor L. Markov, Hanson Wang, Nitya Kasturi, Shaun Singh, Mia Garrard, Sze Wai Yuen, Sarah Tran, Igor Glotov, Tanvi Gupta, Boshuang Huang, Xiaowen Xie, Michael Belkin, Sal Uryasev, Sam Howie, Eytan Bakshy, Norm Zhou
KDD19
2021 Facebook's Cyber-Cyber and Cyber-Physical Digital Twins
abstract
A cyber–cyber digital twin is a simulation of a software system. By contrast, a cyber–physical digital twin is a simulation of a non-software (physical) system. Although cyber–physical digital twins have received a lot of recent attention, their cyber–cyber counterparts have been comparatively overlooked. In this paper we show how the unique properties of cyber–cyber digital twins open up exciting opportunities for research and development. Like all digital twins, the cyber–cyber digital twin is both informed by and informs the behaviour of the twin it simulates. It is therefore a software system that simulates another software system, making it conceptually truly a twin, blurring the distinction between the simulated and the simulator. Cyber–cyber digital twins can be twins of other cyber–cyber digital twins, leading to a hierarchy of twins. As we shall see, these apparently philosophical observations have practical ramifications for the design, implementation and deployment of digital twins at Facebook.
John Ahlgren, Kinga Bojarczuk, Sophia Drossopoulou, Inna Dvortsova, Johann George, Natalija Gucevska, Mark Harman, Maria Lomeli, Simon M. M. Lucas, Erik Meijer 0001, Steve Omohundro, Rubmary Rojas, Silvia Sapora, Norm Zhou
EASE14