Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Severi Rissanen

dblp:285/5389 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Generative modeling · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Graph learning · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
2.432025
Free Hunch: Denoiser Covariance Estimation for Diffusion Models Without Extra Costs · ICLR 2025
Equivariant Denoisers Cannot Copy Graphs: Align Your Graph Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025
Generative Modelling with Inverse Heat Dissipation · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
covariance estimation
0.912025
Free Hunch: Denoiser Covariance Estimation for Diffusion Models Without Extra Costs · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
graph diffusion model
0.912025
Equivariant Denoisers Cannot Copy Graphs: Align Your Graph Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation
0.912025
Equivariant Denoisers Cannot Copy Graphs: Align Your Graph Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
guided generation
0.912025
Free Hunch: Denoiser Covariance Estimation for Diffusion Models Without Extra Costs · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation
0.512021
A Critical Look at the Consistency of Causal Estimation with Deep Latent Variable Models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.512021
A Critical Look at the Consistency of Causal Estimation with Deep Latent Variable Models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
deep latent variable model
0.512021
A Critical Look at the Consistency of Causal Estimation with Deep Latent Variable Models · NeurIPS 2021
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem
0.522025
Free Hunch: Denoiser Covariance Estimation for Diffusion Models Without Extra Costs · ICLR 2025
Generative Modelling with Inverse Heat Dissipation · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.312025
Progressive Tempering Sampler with Diffusion · ICML 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration › inverse problem
linear inverse problem
0.312025
Free Hunch: Denoiser Covariance Estimation for Diffusion Models Without Extra Costs · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.112021
A Critical Look at the Consistency of Causal Estimation with Deep Latent Variable Models · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tweedie's formula · 1.7low-rank approximation · 1.7score-based generative modeling · 1.3heat equation · 1.3permutation equivariance · 0.9parallel tempering · 0.9discrete diffusion model · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9alignment · 0.9MCMC · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Equivariant Denoisers Cannot Copy Graphs: Align Your Graph Diffusion Models
abstract
Graph diffusion models, dominant in graph generative modeling, remain underexplored for graph-to-graph translation tasks like chemical reaction prediction. We demonstrate that standard permutation equivariant denoisers face fundamental limitations in these tasks due to their inability to break symmetries in noisy inputs. To address this, we propose \emph{aligning} input and target graphs to break input symmetries while preserving permutation equivariance in non-matching graph portions. Using retrosynthesis (i.e., the task of predicting precursors for synthesis of a given target molecule) as our application domain, we show how alignment dramatically improves discrete diffusion model performance from $5$\% to a SOTA-matching $54.7$\% top-1 accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/Aalto-QuML/DiffAlign.
Najwa Laabid, Severi Rissanen, Markus Heinonen, Arno Solin, Vikas Garg 0001
ICLR2
2025 Free Hunch: Denoiser Covariance Estimation for Diffusion Models Without Extra Costs
abstract
The covariance for clean data given a noisy observation is an important quantity in many training-free guided generation methods for diffusion models. Current methods require heavy test-time computation, altering the standard diffusion training process or denoiser architecture, or making heavy approximations. We propose a new framework that sidesteps these issues by using covariance information that is available for free from training data and the curvature of the generative trajectory, which is linked to the covariance through the second-order Tweedie's formula. We integrate these sources of information using (i) a novel method to transfer covariance estimates across noise levels and (ii) low-rank updates in a given noise level. We validate the method on linear inverse problems, where it outperforms recent baselines, especially with fewer diffusion steps.
Severi Rissanen, Markus Heinonen, Arno Solin
ICLR1
2025 Progressive Tempering Sampler with Diffusion
abstract
Recent research has focused on designing neural samplers that amortize the process of sampling from unnormalized densities. However, despite significant advancements, they still fall short of the state-of-the-art MCMC approach, Parallel Tempering (PT), when it comes to the efficiency of target evaluations. On the other hand, unlike a well-trained neural sampler, PT yields only dependent samples and needs to be rerun---at considerable computational cost---whenever new samples are required. To address these weaknesses, we propose the Progressive Tempering Sampler with Diffusion (PTSD), which trains diffusion models sequentially across temperatures, leveraging the advantages of PT to improve the training of neural samplers. We also introduce a novel method to combine high-temperature diffusion models to generate approximate lower-temperature samples, which are minimally refined using MCMC and used to train the next diffusion model. PTSD enables efficient reuse of sample information across temperature levels while generating well-mixed, uncorrelated samples. Our method significantly improves target evaluation efficiency, outperforming diffusion-based neural samplers.
Severi Rissanen, Ruikang Ouyang, Jiajun He 0003, Markus Heinonen, Arno Solin, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
ICML1
2023 Generative Modelling with Inverse Heat Dissipation
Severi Rissanen, Markus Heinonen, Arno Solin
ICLR1
2021 A Critical Look at the Consistency of Causal Estimation with Deep Latent Variable Models
abstract
Using deep latent variable models in causal inference has attracted considerable interest recently, but an essential open question is their ability to yield consistent causal estimates. While they have demonstrated promising results and theory exists on some simple model formulations, we also know that causal effects are not even identifiable in general with latent variables. We investigate this gap between theory and empirical results with analytical considerations and extensive experiments under multiple synthetic and real-world data sets, using the causal effect variational autoencoder (CEVAE) as a case study. While CEVAE seems to work reliably under some simple scenarios, it does not estimate the causal effect correctly with a misspecified latent variable or a complex data distribution, as opposed to its original motivation. Hence, our results show that more attention should be paid to ensuring the correctness of causal estimates with deep latent variable models.
Severi Rissanen, Pekka Marttinen
NeurIPS1