Mikko Halonen

dblp:285/5931 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 62% Empirical software engineering · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
issue tracking
0.712023
Improved Management of Issue Dependencies in Issue Trackers of Large Collaborative Projects · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories
issue tracker analysis
0.212023
Improved Management of Issue Dependencies in Issue Trackers of Large Collaborative Projects · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.212023
Improved Management of Issue Dependencies in Issue Trackers of Large Collaborative Projects · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph construction · 0.7design science · 0.7consistency checking · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Improved Management of Issue Dependencies in Issue Trackers of Large Collaborative Projects
abstract
Issue trackers, such as Jira, have become the prevalent collaborative tools in software engineering for managing issues, such as requirements, development tasks, and software bugs. However, issue trackers inherently focus on the lifecycle of single issues, although issues have and express dependencies on other issues that constitute issue dependency networks in large complex collaborative projects. The objective of this study is to develop supportive solutions for the improved management of dependent issues in an issue tracker. This study follows the Design Science methodology, consisting of eliciting drawbacks and constructing and evaluating a solution and system. The study was carried out in the context of The Qt Company's Jira, which exemplifies an actively used, almost two-decade-old issue tracker with over 100,000 issues. The drawbacks capture how users operate with issue trackers to handle issue information in large, collaborative, and long-lived projects. The basis of the solution is to keep issues and dependencies as separate objects and automatically construct an issue graph. Dependency detections complement the issue graph by proposing missing dependencies, while consistency checks and diagnoses identify conflicting issue priorities and release assignments. Jira's plugin and service-based system architecture realize the functional and quality concerns of the system implementation. We show how to adopt the intelligent supporting techniques of an issue tracker in a complex use context and a large data-set. The solution considers an integrated and holistic system view, practical applicability and utility, and the practical characteristics of issue data, such as inherent incompleteness.
Mikko Raatikainen, Quim Motger, Clara Marie Lüders, Xavier Franch, Lalli Myllyaho, Elina Kettunen, Jordi Marco, Juha Tiihonen, Mikko Halonen, Tomi Männistö
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.9