Kyle Hippe

dblp:285/6543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-9470-572XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 77% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.812024
MProt-DPO: Breaking the ExaFLOPS Barrier for Multimodal Protein Design Workflows with Direct Preference Optimization · SC 2024
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU and heterogeneous computing
0.212024
MProt-DPO: Breaking the ExaFLOPS Barrier for Multimodal Protein Design Workflows with Direct Preference Optimization · SC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal generative models · 0.8mixed precision · 0.8direct preference optimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 MProt-DPO: Breaking the ExaFLOPS Barrier for Multimodal Protein Design Workflows with Direct Preference Optimization
abstract
We present a scalable, end-to-end workflow for protein design. By augmenting protein sequences with natural language descriptions of their biochemical properties, we train generative models that can be preferentially aligned with protein fitness landscapes. Through complex experimental-and simulation-based observations, we integrate these measures as preferred parameters for generating new protein variants and demonstrate our workflow on five diverse supercomputers. We achieve >1 ExaFLOPS sustained performance in mixed precision on each supercomputer and a maximum sustained performance of 4.11 Ex-aFLOPS and peak performance of 5.57 ExaFLOPS. We establish the scientific performance of our model on two tasks: (1) across a predetermined benchmark dataset of deep mutational scanning experiments to optimize the fitness-determining mutations in the yeast protein HIS7, and (2) in optimizing the design of the enzyme malate dehydrogenase to achieve lower activation barriers (and therefore increased catalytic rates) using simulation data. Our implementation thus sets high watermarks for multimodal protein design workflows.
Gautham Dharuman, Kyle Hippe, Alex Brace, Sam Foreman, Väinö Hatanpää, Varuni Sastry 0001, Huihuo Zheng, Logan T. Ward, Servesh Muralidharan, Archit Vasan, Bharat Kale, Carla M. Mann, Yun-Hsuan Cheng, Yuliana Zamora, Shengchao Liu, Chaowei Xiao, Murali Emani, Tom Gibbs, Mahidhar Tatineni, Deepak Canchi, Jerome Mitchell, Koichi Yamada, María Jesús Garzarán, Michael E. Papka, Ian T. Foster, Rick L. Stevens, Anima Anandkumar, Venkatram Vishwanath, Arvind Ramanathan
SC2
2022 ZoomQA: residue-level protein model accuracy estimation with machine learning on sequential and 3D structural features
abstract
MOTIVATION: The Estimation of Model Accuracy problem is a cornerstone problem in the field of Bioinformatics. As of CASP14, there are 79 global QA methods, and a minority of 39 residue-level QA methods with very few of them working on protein complexes. Here, we introduce ZoomQA, a novel, single-model method for assessing the accuracy of a tertiary protein structure/complex prediction at residue level, which have many applications such as drug discovery. ZoomQA differs from others by considering the change in chemical and physical features of a fragment structure (a portion of a protein within a radius $r$ of the target amino acid) as the radius of contact increases. Fourteen physical and chemical properties of amino acids are used to build a comprehensive representation of every residue within a protein and grade their placement within the protein as a whole. Moreover, we have shown the potential of ZoomQA to identify problematic regions of the SARS-CoV-2 protein complex. RESULTS: We benchmark ZoomQA on CASP14, and it outperforms other state-of-the-art local QA methods and rivals state of the art QA methods in global prediction metrics. Our experiment shows the efficacy of these new features and shows that our method is able to match the performance of other state-of-the-art methods without the use of homology searching against databases or PSSM matrices. AVAILABILITY: http://zoomQA.renzhitech.com.
Kyle Hippe, Cade Lilley, Joshua William Berkenpas, Ciri Chandana Pocha, Kiyomi Kishaba, Jie Hou 0001, Dong Si, Renzhi Cao
Briefings Bioinform.1