Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hanbyul Lee 0001

dblp:285/6637-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 67% Optimization for machine learning · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.612022
Support Recovery in Sparse PCA with Incomplete Data · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex relaxation
semidefinite programming relaxation
0.612022
Support Recovery in Sparse PCA with Incomplete Data · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
sparse principal component analysis
0.612022
Support Recovery in Sparse PCA with Incomplete Data · NeurIPS 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.212022
Support Recovery in Sparse PCA with Incomplete Data · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support recovery analysis · 1.1semidefinite programming · 1.1l1 regularization · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Support Recovery in Sparse PCA with General Missing Data
abstract
We analyze a sparse PCA algorithm for incomplete and noisy data without any specific model assumption on the data missing scheme. We utilize a graphical approach to characterize general missing patterns, which enables us to analyze the effect of structural properties of missing patterns on the solvability of sparse PCA problem. The sparse PCA method we focus on is a semidefinite relaxation of the $\ell_1$-regularized PCA problem. We provide theoretical justification that the support of the sparse leading eigenvector can be recovered with high probability using the algorithm, under certain conditions. The conditions involve the spectral gap between the largest and second-largest eigenvalues of the true data matrix, the magnitude of the noise, and the structural properties of the missing pattern. The concepts of algebraic connectivity and irregularity are used to describe the properties in a graphical way. We empirically justify our theorem with synthetic data analysis. We show that the SDP algorithm outperforms other sparse PCA approaches especially when the observation pattern has good structural properties. As a by-product of our analysis, we provide two theorems to handle general missing schemes, which can be applied to other problems related to incomplete data matrices.
Hanbyul Lee 0001, Qifan Song, Jean Honorio
UAI1
2022 On the Fundamental Limits of Exact Inference in Structured Prediction
abstract
Inference in structured prediction is naturally modeled with a graph, where the goal is to recover the unknown true label for each node given noisy observations corresponding to nodes and edges. The focus of this paper is on the fundamental limits of exact recovery irrespective of computational efficiency, assuming the generative process proposed by [1]. Analyzing the fundamental limits is crucial for algorithm evaluation and development. In this regard, we establish the information-theoretic limit bounds and show that there exists a gap between the limits and the performance of the existent tractable method [2], implying the need for further development of algorithms for exact inference. The fundamental limit we suggest applies to general connected graphs and involves graphical metrics such as the Cheeger constant and the maximum degree. Finally, we reveal that the sufficient and necessary conditions derived from the limit bounds are tight up to a logarithmic factor for a wide range of graphs.
Hanbyul Lee 0001, Kevin Bello, Jean Honorio
ISIT1
2022 Support Recovery in Sparse PCA with Incomplete Data
abstract
We study a practical algorithm for sparse principal component analysis (PCA) of incomplete and noisy data.Our algorithm is based on the semidefinite program (SDP) relaxation of the non-convex $l_1$-regularized PCA problem.We provide theoretical and experimental evidence that SDP enables us to exactly recover the true support of the sparse leading eigenvector of the unknown true matrix, despite only observing an incomplete (missing uniformly at random) and noisy version of it.We derive sufficient conditions for exact recovery, which involve matrix incoherence, the spectral gap between the largest and second-largest eigenvalues, the observation probability and the noise variance.We validate our theoretical results with incomplete synthetic data, and show encouraging and meaningful results on a gene expression dataset.
Hanbyul Lee 0001, Qifan Song, Jean Honorio
NeurIPS1