Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Asaf Maman
dblp:286/1764
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 40% Deep learning architectures and training · 21% Learning theory · 21% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Implicit Regularization in Hierarchical Tensor Factorization and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · ICML 2022 Implicit Regularization in Tensor Factorization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Implicit Regularization in Hierarchical Tensor Factorization and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Implicit Regularization in Tensor Factorization · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient descent · 1.1dynamical systems · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Implicit Regularization in Hierarchical Tensor Factorization and Deep Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractIn the pursuit of explaining implicit regularization in deep learning, prominent focus was given to matrix and tensor factorizations, which correspond to simplified neural networks. It was shown that these models exhibit an implicit tendency towards low matrix and tensor ranks, respectively. Drawing closer to practical deep learning, the current paper theoretically analyzes the implicit regularization in hierarchical tensor factorization, a model equivalent to certain deep convolutional neural networks. Through a dynamical systems lens, we overcome challenges associated with hierarchy, and establish implicit regularization towards low hierarchical tensor rank. This translates to an implicit regularization towards locality for the associated convolutional networks. Inspired by our theory, we design explicit regularization discouraging locality, and demonstrate its ability to improve the performance of modern convolutional networks on non-local tasks, in defiance of conventional wisdom by which architectural changes are needed. Our work highlights the potential of enhancing neural networks via theoretical analysis of their implicit regularization. Noam Razin, Asaf Maman, Nadav Cohen 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Implicit Regularization in Tensor FactorizationabstractRecent efforts to unravel the mystery of implicit regularization in deep learning have led to a theoretical focus on matrix factorization — matrix completion via linear neural network. As a step further towards practical deep learning, we provide the first theoretical analysis of implicit regularization in tensor factorization — tensor completion via certain type of non-linear neural network. We circumvent the notorious difficulty of tensor problems by adopting a dynamical systems perspective, and characterizing the evolution induced by gradient descent. The characterization suggests a form of greedy low tensor rank search, which we rigorously prove under certain conditions, and empirically demonstrate under others. Motivated by tensor rank capturing the implicit regularization of a non-linear neural network, we empirically explore it as a measure of complexity, and find that it captures the essence of datasets on which neural networks generalize. This leads us to believe that tensor rank may pave way to explaining both implicit regularization in deep learning, and the properties of real-world data translating this implicit regularization to generalization. Noam Razin, Asaf Maman, Nadav Cohen 0001 |
ICML | 2 |