Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthew Parkinson

dblp:286/2448 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 75% Concurrent programming · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Concurrent programming
concurrency bugs
0.512021
Nekara: Generalized Concurrency Testing · ASE 2021
Software testing
concurrency testing
0.512021
Nekara: Generalized Concurrency Testing · ASE 2021
Software testing › concurrency testing
interleaving exploration
0.512021
Nekara: Generalized Concurrency Testing · ASE 2021
Software testing › concurrency testing
systematic concurrency testing
0.512021
Nekara: Generalized Concurrency Testing · ASE 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic testing · 0.5scheduling · 0.5exploration algorithms · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Nekara: Generalized Concurrency Testing
abstract
Testing concurrent systems remains an uncomfortable problem for developers. The common industrial practice is to stress-test a system against large workloads, with the hope of triggering enough corner-case interleavings that reveal bugs. However, stress testing is often inefficient and its ability to get coverage of interleavings is unclear. In reaction, the research community has proposed the idea of systematic testing, where a tool takes over the scheduling of concurrent actions so that it can perform an algorithmic search over the space of interleavings.We present an experience paper on the application of systematic testing to several case studies. We separate the algorithmic advancements in prior work (on searching the large space of interleavings) from the engineering of their tools. The latter was unsatisfactory; often the tools were limited to a small domain, hard to maintain, and hard to extend to other domains. We designed Nekara, an open-source cross-platform library for easily building custom systematic testing solutions.We show that (1) Nekara can effectively encapsulate state-of-the-art exploration algorithms by evaluating on prior bench-marks, and (2) Nekara can be applied to a wide variety of scenarios, including existing open-source systems as well as production distributed services of Microsoft Azure. Nekara was easy to use, improved testing, and found multiple new bugs.
Udit Agarwal, Pantazis Deligiannis, Kumseok Jung, Akash Lal, Immad Naseer, Matthew Parkinson, Arun Thangamani, Jyothi Vedurada
ASE7
2019 BUILDing a community of female makers through hands-on experiences in a university MakerSpace
abstract
This full innovative practice paper presents data and the framework for implementation of BUILD, a women’s Maker initiative that dynamically weaves together female faculty and students to build engineering identities. Presenting one semester of activities and findings, this paper proposes a model for academic institutions and other stakeholders to launch similar initiatives. In the context of our program, female students and faculty gain expertise in machining and manufacturing while also building support systems through peer-to-peer and student-faculty mentoring that we expect will enable persistence through engineering and will illuminate the pathway to professorial careers.
Jessica Menold, Catherine Berdanier, Sarah C. Ritter, Meg Handley, Caitlin A. Grady, Margaret L. Byron, Elizabeth Starkey, Scarlett R. Miller, Matthew Parkinson
FIE9