Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Micah J. Fry
dblp:286/5471
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Logical Options Framework · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
option discovery |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Logical Options Framework · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy composition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Logical Options Framework · ICML 2021 |
Automata and formal languages
finite automata |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The Logical Options Framework · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
planning · 1.0hierarchical reinforcement learning · 1.0automaton representation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | The Logical Options FrameworkabstractLearning composable policies for environments with complex rules and tasks is a challenging problem. We introduce a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework called the Logical Options Framework (LOF) that learns policies that are satisfying, optimal, and composable. LOF efficiently learns policies that satisfy tasks by representing the task as an automaton and integrating it into learning and planning. We provide and prove conditions under which LOF will learn satisfying, optimal policies. And lastly, we show how LOF’s learned policies can be composed to satisfy unseen tasks with only 10-50 retraining steps on our benchmarks. We evaluate LOF on four tasks in discrete and continuous domains, including a 3D pick-and-place environment. Brandon Araki, Xiao Li 0025, Kiran Vodrahalli, Jonathan A. DeCastro, Micah J. Fry, Daniela Rus |
ICML | 5 |