Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Guy Ohayon

dblp:287/4281 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-5112-6558ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
7 papers
Image and video processing · 73% Image and video coding · 27%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Generative modeling · 53% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image restoration
4.872025
ELAD: Blind Face Restoration using Expectation-based Likelihood Approximation and Diffusion Prior · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025
Posterior-Mean Rectified Flow: Towards Minimum MSE Photo-Realistic Image Restoration · ICLR 2025
Perceptual Fairness in Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.832025
Compressed Image Generation with Denoising Diffusion Codebook Models · ICML 2025
Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023
ELAD: Blind Face Restoration using Expectation-based Likelihood Approximation and Diffusion Prior · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration › face restoration
blind face restoration
0.912025
ELAD: Blind Face Restoration using Expectation-based Likelihood Approximation and Diffusion Prior · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025
Image and video coding › image compression
lossy image compression
0.912025
Compressed Image Generation with Denoising Diffusion Codebook Models · ICML 2025
Image and video coding › image compression
perceptual image compression
0.912025
Compressed Image Generation with Denoising Diffusion Codebook Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
Perceptual Fairness in Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2024
Image and video processing › super-resolution
image super-resolution
0.812024
The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.712023
Reasons for the Superiority of Stochastic Estimators over Deterministic Ones: Robustness, Consistency and Perceptual Quality · ICML 2023
Image and video coding
perceptual quality optimization
0.712023
Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial robustness
0.212024
The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.212023
Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

posterior sampling · 3.7optimal transport · 2.2score-based posterior sampling · 1.7expectation-based likelihood approximation · 1.7diffusion prior · 1.7bayesian inference · 1.7lipschitz analysis · 1.5group perceptual index · 1.5rectified flow · 0.9generative adversarial network · 0.9variational autoencoder · 0.7few-shot adaptation · 0.7adversarial attack analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Posterior-Mean Rectified Flow: Towards Minimum MSE Photo-Realistic Image Restoration
abstract
Photo-realistic image restoration algorithms are typically evaluated by distortion measures (e.g., PSNR, SSIM) and by perceptual quality measures (e.g., FID, NIQE), where the desire is to attain the lowest possible distortion without compromising on perceptual quality. To achieve this goal, current methods commonly attempt to sample from the posterior distribution, or to optimize a weighted sum of a distortion loss (e.g., MSE) and a perceptual quality loss (e.g., GAN). Unlike previous works, this paper is concerned specifically with the *optimal* estimator that minimizes the MSE under a constraint of perfect perceptual index, namely where the distribution of the reconstructed images is equal to that of the ground-truth ones. A recent theoretical result shows that such an estimator can be constructed by optimally transporting the posterior mean prediction (MMSE estimate) to the distribution of the ground-truth images. Inspired by this result, we introduce Posterior-Mean Rectified Flow (PMRF), a simple yet highly effective algorithm that approximates this optimal estimator. In particular, PMRF first predicts the posterior mean, and then transports the result to a high-quality image using a rectified flow model that approximates the desired optimal transport map. We investigate the theoretical utility of PMRF and demonstrate that it consistently outperforms previous methods on a variety of image restoration tasks.
Guy Ohayon, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad
ICLR1
2025 Compressed Image Generation with Denoising Diffusion Codebook Models
abstract
We present a novel generative approach based on Denoising Diffusion Models (DDMs), which produces high-quality image samples along with their losslessly compressed bit-stream representations. This is obtained by replacing the standard Gaussian noise sampling in the reverse diffusion with a selection of noise samples from pre-defined codebooks of fixed iid Gaussian vectors. Surprisingly, we find that our method, termed Denoising Diffusion Codebook Model (DDCM), retains sample quality and diversity of standard DDMs, even for extremely small codebooks. We leverage DDCM and pick the noises from the codebooks that best match a given image, converting our generative model into a highly effective lossy image codec achieving state-of-the-art perceptual image compression results. More generally, by setting other noise selections rules, we extend our compression method to any conditional image generation task (e.g., image restoration), where the generated images are produced jointly with their condensed bit-stream representations. Our work is accompanied by a mathematical interpretation of the proposed compressed conditional generation schemes, establishing a connection with score-based approximations of posterior samplers for the tasks considered. Code and demo are available on our project’s website.
Guy Ohayon, Hila Manor, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad
ICML1
2025 ELAD: Blind Face Restoration using Expectation-based Likelihood Approximation and Diffusion Prior
abstract
Blind Face Restoration (BFR) aims to recover face images suffering from unknown degradations. A recent approach to solve BFR is via plug-and-play methods for image restoration, which combine a likelihood function with pre-trained diffusion models as priors. However, as the likelihood is inherently unknown in BFR, existing methods rely instead on heuristic constraints. This leads to suboptimal distortion and identity preservation metrics. We introduce Expectation-based Likelihood Approximation with Diffusion prior (ELAD), a novel plug-and-play approach that explicitly models the likelihood function for BFR. ELAD estimates the first and second moments of the likelihood distribution by employing a Degradation Estimator to predict the degradation sequence from the input. This enables principled Bayesian inference without requiring end-to-end training. Our method achieves state-of-the-art distortion and identity preservation results compared to existing plug-and-play BFR techniques, while maintaining competitive perceptual quality. As we show, while being plug-and-play, our method still rivals end-to-end trained BFR models.
Sean Man, Guy Ohayon, Ron Raphaeli, Matan Kleiner, Michael Elad
SIGGRAPH Asia2
2024 The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration
abstract
We study the behavior of deterministic methods for solving inverse problems in imaging. These methods are commonly designed to achieve two goals: (1) attaining high perceptual quality, and (2) generating reconstructions that are consistent with the measurements. We provide a rigorous proof that the better a predictor satisfies these two requirements, the larger its Lipschitz constant must be, regardless of the nature of the degradation involved. In particular, to approach perfect perceptual quality and perfect consistency, the Lipschitz constant of the model must grow to infinity. This implies that such methods are necessarily more susceptible to adversarial attacks. We demonstrate our theory on single image super-resolution algorithms, addressing both noisy and noiseless settings. We also show how this undesired behavior can be leveraged to explore the posterior distribution, thereby allowing the deterministic model to imitate stochastic methods.
Guy Ohayon, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad
ICML1
2024 Perceptual Fairness in Image Restoration
abstract
Fairness in image restoration tasks is the desire to treat different sub-groups of images equally well. Existing definitions of fairness in image restoration are highly restrictive. They consider a reconstruction to be a correct outcome for a group (e.g., women) *only* if it falls within the group's set of ground truth images (e.g., natural images of women); otherwise, it is considered *entirely* incorrect. Consequently, such definitions are prone to controversy, as errors in image restoration can manifest in various ways. In this work we offer an alternative approach towards fairness in image restoration, by considering the *Group Perceptual Index* (GPI), which we define as the statistical distance between the distribution of the group's ground truth images and the distribution of their reconstructions. We assess the fairness of an algorithm by comparing the GPI of different groups, and say that it achieves perfect *Perceptual Fairness* (PF) if the GPIs of all groups are identical. We motivate and theoretically study our new notion of fairness, draw its connection to previous ones, and demonstrate its utility on state-of-the-art face image restoration algorithms.
Guy Ohayon, Michael Elad, Tomer Michaeli
NeurIPS1
2023 Reasons for the Superiority of Stochastic Estimators over Deterministic Ones: Robustness, Consistency and Perceptual Quality
abstract
Stochastic restoration algorithms allow to explore the space of solutions that correspond to the degraded input. In this paper we reveal additional fundamental advantages of stochastic methods over deterministic ones, which further motivate their use. First, we prove that any restoration algorithm that attains perfect perceptual quality and whose outputs are consistent with the input must be a posterior sampler, and is thus required to be stochastic. Second, we illustrate that while deterministic restoration algorithms may attain high perceptual quality, this can be achieved only by filling up the space of all possible source images using an extremely sensitive mapping, which makes them highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Indeed, we show that enforcing deterministic models to be robust to such attacks profoundly hinders their perceptual quality, while robustifying stochastic models hardly influences their perceptual quality, and improves their output variability. These findings provide a motivation to foster progress in stochastic restoration methods, paving the way to better recovery algorithms.
Guy Ohayon, Theo Adrai, Michael Elad, Tomer Michaeli
ICML1
2023 Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration
abstract
We propose an image restoration algorithm that can control the perceptual quality and/or the mean square error (MSE) of any pre-trained model, trading one over the other at test time. Our algorithm is few-shot: Given about a dozen images restored by the model, it can significantly improve the perceptual quality and/or the MSE of the model for newly restored images without further training. Our approach is motivated by a recent theoretical result that links between the minimum MSE (MMSE) predictor and the predictor that minimizes the MSE under a perfect perceptual quality constraint. Specifically, it has been shown that the latter can be obtained by optimally transporting the output of the former, such that its distribution matches that of the source data. Thus, to improve the perceptual quality of a predictor that was originally trained to minimize MSE, we approximate the optimal transport by a linear transformation in the latent space of a variational auto-encoder, which we compute in closed-form using empirical means and covariances. Going beyond the theory, we find that applying the same procedure on models that were initially trained to achieve high perceptual quality, typically improves their perceptual quality even further. And by interpolating the results with the original output of the model, we can improve their MSE on the expense of perceptual quality. We illustrate our method on a variety of degradations applied to general content images with arbitrary dimensions.
Theo Adrai, Guy Ohayon, Michael Elad, Tomer Michaeli
NeurIPS2