Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Theo Adrai
dblp:287/4588 · also Theo Joseph Adrai
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 67% Image and video coding · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Generative modeling · 44% Optimization for machine learning · 13% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image restoration |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023 Reasons for the Superiority of Stochastic Estimators over Deterministic Ones: Robustness, Consistency and Perceptual Quality · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Reasons for the Superiority of Stochastic Estimators over Deterministic Ones: Robustness, Consistency and Perceptual Quality · ICML 2023 |
Image and video coding
perceptual quality optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 1.3posterior sampling · 1.3optimal transport · 1.3few-shot adaptation · 1.3adversarial attack analysis · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Reasons for the Superiority of Stochastic Estimators over Deterministic Ones: Robustness, Consistency and Perceptual QualityabstractStochastic restoration algorithms allow to explore the space of solutions that correspond to the degraded input. In this paper we reveal additional fundamental advantages of stochastic methods over deterministic ones, which further motivate their use. First, we prove that any restoration algorithm that attains perfect perceptual quality and whose outputs are consistent with the input must be a posterior sampler, and is thus required to be stochastic. Second, we illustrate that while deterministic restoration algorithms may attain high perceptual quality, this can be achieved only by filling up the space of all possible source images using an extremely sensitive mapping, which makes them highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Indeed, we show that enforcing deterministic models to be robust to such attacks profoundly hinders their perceptual quality, while robustifying stochastic models hardly influences their perceptual quality, and improves their output variability. These findings provide a motivation to foster progress in stochastic restoration methods, paving the way to better recovery algorithms. Guy Ohayon, Theo Adrai, Michael Elad, Tomer Michaeli |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image RestorationabstractWe propose an image restoration algorithm that can control the perceptual quality and/or the mean square error (MSE) of any pre-trained model, trading one over the other at test time. Our algorithm is few-shot: Given about a dozen images restored by the model, it can significantly improve the perceptual quality and/or the MSE of the model for newly restored images without further training. Our approach is motivated by a recent theoretical result that links between the minimum MSE (MMSE) predictor and the predictor that minimizes the MSE under a perfect perceptual quality constraint. Specifically, it has been shown that the latter can be obtained by optimally transporting the output of the former, such that its distribution matches that of the source data. Thus, to improve the perceptual quality of a predictor that was originally trained to minimize MSE, we approximate the optimal transport by a linear transformation in the latent space of a variational auto-encoder, which we compute in closed-form using empirical means and covariances. Going beyond the theory, we find that applying the same procedure on models that were initially trained to achieve high perceptual quality, typically improves their perceptual quality even further. And by interpolating the results with the original output of the model, we can improve their MSE on the expense of perceptual quality. We illustrate our method on a variety of degradations applied to general content images with arbitrary dimensions. Theo Adrai, Guy Ohayon, Michael Elad, Tomer Michaeli |
NeurIPS | 1 |