Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kieran A. Murphy
dblp:287/4780
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 41% 3D vision · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
object pose estimation |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Learning ABCs: Approximate Bijective Correspondence for isolating factors of variation with weak supervision · CVPR 2022 Implicit-PDF: Non-Parametric Representation of Probability Distributions on the Rotation Manifold · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Interpretability with full complexity by constraining feature information · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
factor of variation disentanglement |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning ABCs: Approximate Bijective Correspondence for isolating factors of variation with weak supervision · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Implicit-PDF: Non-Parametric Representation of Probability Distributions on the Rotation Manifold · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature information constraint · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.6bijective correspondence · 0.6neural network density estimation · 0.5gradient ascent · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Interpretability with full complexity by constraining feature information
Kieran A. Murphy, Danielle S. Bassett |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning ABCs: Approximate Bijective Correspondence for isolating factors of variation with weak supervisionabstractRepresentational learning forms the backbone of most deep learning applications, and the value of a learned representation is intimately tied to its information content regarding different factors of variation. Finding good representations depends on the nature of supervision and the learning algorithm. We propose a novel algorithm that utilizes a weak form of supervision where the data is partitioned into sets according to certain inactive (common) factors of variation which are invariant across elements of each set. Our key insight is that by seeking correspondence between elements of different sets, we learn strong representations that exclude the inactive factors of variation and isolate the active factors that vary within all sets. As a consequence of focusing on the active factors, our method can leverage a mix of setsupervised and wholly unsupervised data, which can even belong to a different domain. We tackle the challenging problem of synthetic-to-real object pose transfer, without pose annotations on anything, by isolating pose information which generalizes to the category level and across the synthetic/real domain gap. The method can also boost performance in supervised settings, by strengthening intermediate representations, as well as operate in practically attainable scenarios with set-supervised natural images, where quantity is limited and nuisance factors of variation are more plentiful. Accompanying code may be found on github. Kieran A. Murphy, Varun Jampani, Srikumar Ramalingam, Ameesh Makadia |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Implicit-PDF: Non-Parametric Representation of Probability Distributions on the Rotation ManifoldabstractIn the deep learning era, the vast majority of methods to predict pose from a single image are trained to classify or regress to a single given ground truth pose per image. Such methods have two main shortcomings, i) they cannot represent uncertainty about the predictions, and ii) they cannot handle symmetric objects, where multiple (potentially infinite) poses may be correct. Only recently these shortcomings have been addressed, but current approaches as limited in that they cannot express the full rich space of distributions on the rotation manifold. To this end, we introduce a method to estimate arbitrary, non-parametric distributions on SO(3). Our key idea is to represent the distributions implicitly, with a neural network that estimates the probability density, given the input image and a candidate pose. At inference time, grid sampling or gradient ascent can be used to find the most likely pose, but it is also possible to evaluate the density at any pose, enabling reasoning about symmetries and uncertainty. This is the most general way of representing distributions on manifolds, and to demonstrate its expressive power we introduce a new dataset containing symmetric and nearly-symmetric objects. Our method also shows advantages on the popular object pose estimation benchmarks ModelNet10-SO(3) and T-LESS. Code, data, and visualizations may be found at implicit-pdf.github.io. Kieran A. Murphy, Carlos Esteves, Varun Jampani, Srikumar Ramalingam, Ameesh Makadia |
ICML | 1 |