Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Antonis Vasileiou
dblp:287/6650
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 50% Learning theory · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization theory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph similarity theory · 0.9graph isomorphism testing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networksabstractThe expressive power of message-passing graph neural networks (MPNNs) is reasonably well understood, primarily through combinatorial techniques from graph isomorphism testing. However, MPNNs' generalization abilities---making meaningful predictions beyond the training set---remain less explored. Current generalization analyses often overlook graph structure, limit the focus to specific aggregation functions, and assume the impractical, hard-to-optimize $0$-$1$ loss function. Here, we extend recent advances in graph similarity theory to assess the influence of graph structure, aggregation, and loss functions on MPNNs' generalization abilities. Our empirical study supports our theoretical insights, improving our understanding of MPNNs' generalization properties. Antonis Vasileiou, Ben Finkelshtein, Floris Geerts, Ron Levie, Christopher Morris 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | IMCF: The IoT Meta-Control Firewall for Smart Buildings
Soteris Constantinou, Antonis Vasileiou, Andreas Konstantinidis 0002, Panos K. Chrysanthis, Demetris Zeinalipour |
EDBT | 2 |