Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonis Vasileiou

dblp:287/6650 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 50% Learning theory · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization analysis
0.912025
Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization theory
0.912025
Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.912025
Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
0.912025
Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph similarity theory · 0.9graph isomorphism testing · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks
abstract
The expressive power of message-passing graph neural networks (MPNNs) is reasonably well understood, primarily through combinatorial techniques from graph isomorphism testing. However, MPNNs' generalization abilities---making meaningful predictions beyond the training set---remain less explored. Current generalization analyses often overlook graph structure, limit the focus to specific aggregation functions, and assume the impractical, hard-to-optimize $0$-$1$ loss function. Here, we extend recent advances in graph similarity theory to assess the influence of graph structure, aggregation, and loss functions on MPNNs' generalization abilities. Our empirical study supports our theoretical insights, improving our understanding of MPNNs' generalization properties.
Antonis Vasileiou, Ben Finkelshtein, Floris Geerts, Ron Levie, Christopher Morris 0001
ICML1
2021 IMCF: The IoT Meta-Control Firewall for Smart Buildings
Soteris Constantinou, Antonis Vasileiou, Andreas Konstantinidis 0002, Panos K. Chrysanthis, Demetris Zeinalipour
EDBT2