Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clémence Réda
dblp:288/0376
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3238-0258ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Bandits · NeurIPS 2022 Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identification · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
pure exploration |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Bandits · NeurIPS 2022 Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identification · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | An Anytime Algorithm for Good Arm Identification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Data mining
dimensionality reduction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Multivariate Functional Linear Discriminant Analysis for Partially-Observed Time Series (Abstract Reprint) · AAAI 2026 |
Data mining › statistical analysis
functional data analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Multivariate Functional Linear Discriminant Analysis for Partially-Observed Time Series (Abstract Reprint) · AAAI 2026 |
Algorithms and data structures
anytime algorithms |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | An Anytime Algorithm for Good Arm Identification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
budget-constrained bandit |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | An Anytime Algorithm for Good Arm Identification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
multi-agent bandit |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Bandits · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Bandits · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
linear bandits |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identification · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › linear bandits
misspecified linear bandit |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m Identification · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
phased elimination · 1.1stopping rules · 1.0stopping rule · 1.0stochastic bandits · 1.0stochastic bandit · 1.0linear discriminant analysis · 1.0expectation/conditional-maximisation · 1.0data-dependent sampling · 0.6sample complexity lower bounds · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Multivariate Functional Linear Discriminant Analysis for Partially-Observed Time Series (Abstract Reprint)abstractThe more extensive access to time-series data, especially for biomedical purposes, raises new methodological challenges, particularly regarding missing values. Functional linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) extends Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)-mediated multiclass classification and dimension reduction to data in the form of fragmented observations of a univariate function. For large multivariate and partially-observed data, there are two challenges: (i) statistical dependencies between different components of a multivariate function and (ii) heterogeneous sampling times with missing features. We here develop a multivariate version of FLDA, called MUDRA, to tackle these challenges and describe a computationally efficient expectation/conditional-maximisation (ECM) algorithm to infer its parameters without any tensor inversions. We assess its predictive power on the “Articulary Words” dataset and show its improvement over the state-of-the-art, especially in the case of missing data. This advancement in dimension reduction of multivariate functional data holds promise for enhancing classification accuracy in scenarios like partially observed short multivariate time series analysis. Rahul Bordoloi, Clémence Réda, Orell Trautmann, Saptarshi Bej, Olaf Wolkenhauer |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2026 | An Anytime Algorithm for Good Arm IdentificationabstractIn good arm identification (GAI), the goal is to identify one arm whose average performance exceeds a given threshold, referred to as a good arm, if it exists. Few works have studied GAI in the fixed-budget setting when the sampling budget is fixed beforehand, or in the anytime setting, when a recommendation can be asked at any time. We propose APGAI, an anytime and parameter-free sampling rule for GAI in stochastic bandits. APGAI can be straightforwardly used in fixed-confidence and fixed-budget settings. First, we derive upper bounds on its probability of error at any time. They show that adaptive strategies can be more efficient in detecting the absence of good arms than uniform sampling in several diverse instances. Second, when APGAI is combined with a stopping rule, we prove upper bounds on the expected sampling complexity, holding at any confidence level. Finally, we show the good empirical performance of APGAI on synthetic and real-world data. Our work offers an extensive overview of the GAI problem in all settings. Marc Jourdan, Andrée Delahaye-Duriez, Clémence Réda |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2026 | Correction: Multivariate functional linear discriminant analysis for partially‑observed time seriesabstractIn the original publication of this article, the legend for Fig. 3 was inadvertently omitted in the published version.Specifically, the right-hand plot, depicting the performance of MUDRA on a synthetic dataset in terms of F1 score relative to the baseline ROCKET, was missing the legend identifying the respective models.For completeness and transparency, the incorrect and correct versions of Fig. 3 are presented with this correction article.The original article has been corrected.The original article can be found online at h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 7 / s 1 0 9 9 4 -0 2 5 -0 6 7 4 1 -0 . Rahul Bordoloi, Clémence Réda, Orell Trautmann, Saptarshi Bej, Olaf Wolkenhauer |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2025 | Joint embedding-classifier learning for interpretable collaborative filteringabstractBACKGROUND: Interpretability is a topical question in recommender systems, especially in healthcare applications. An interpretable classifier quantifies the importance of each input feature for the predicted item-user association in a non-ambiguous fashion. RESULTS: We introduce the novel Joint Embedding Learning-classifier for improved Interpretability (JELI). By combining the training of a structured collaborative-filtering classifier and an embedding learning task, JELI predicts new user-item associations based on jointly learned item and user embeddings while providing feature-wise importance scores. Therefore, JELI flexibly allows the introduction of priors on the connections between users, items, and features. In particular, JELI simultaneously (a) learns feature, item, and user embeddings; (b) predicts new item-user associations; (c) provides importance scores for each feature. Moreover, JELI instantiates a generic approach to training recommender systems by encoding generic graph-regularization constraints. CONCLUSIONS: First, we show that the joint training approach yields a gain in the predictive power of the downstream classifier. Second, JELI can recover feature-association dependencies. Finally, JELI induces a restriction in the number of parameters compared to baselines in synthetic and drug-repurposing data sets. Clémence Réda, Jill-Jênn Vie, Olaf Wolkenhauer |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2025 | Multivariate functional linear discriminant analysis for partially-observed time seriesabstractAbstract The more extensive access to time-series data, especially for biomedical purposes, raises new methodological challenges, particularly regarding missing values. Functional linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) extends Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)-mediated multiclass classification and dimension reduction to data in the form of fragmented observations of a univariate function. For large multivariate and partially-observed data, there are two challenges: (i) statistical dependencies between different components of a multivariate function and (ii) heterogeneous sampling times with missing features. We here develop a multivariate version of FLDA, called MUDRA, to tackle these challenges and describe a computationally efficient expectation/conditional-maximisation (ECM) algorithm to infer its parameters without any tensor inversions. We assess its predictive power on the “Articulary Words” dataset and show its improvement over the state-of-the-art, especially in the case of missing data. This advancement in dimension reduction of multivariate functional data holds promise for enhancing classification accuracy in scenarios like partially observed short multivariate time series analysis. Rahul Bordoloi, Clémence Réda, Orell Trautmann, Saptarshi Bej, Olaf Wolkenhauer |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2022 | Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in BanditsabstractThis paper introduces a general multi-agent bandit model in which each agent is facing a finite set of arms and may communicate with other agents through a central controller in order to identify -in pure exploration- or play -in regret minimization- its optimal arm. The twist is that the optimal arm for each agent is the arm with largest expected mixed reward, where the mixed reward of an arm is a weighted sum of the rewards of this arm for all agents. This makes communication between agents often necessary. This general setting allows to recover and extend several recent models for collaborative bandit learning, including the recently proposed federated learning with personalization [Shi et al., 2021]. In this paper, we provide new lower bounds on the sample complexity of pure exploration and on the regret. We then propose a near-optimal algorithm for pure exploration. This algorithm is based on phased elimination with two novel ingredients: a data-dependent sampling scheme within each phase, aimed at matching a relaxation of the lower bound. Clémence Réda, Sattar Vakili, Emilie Kaufmann |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Top-m identification for linear banditsabstractMotivated by an application to drug repurposing, we propose the first algorithms to tackle the identification of the m ≥ 1 arms with largest means in a linear bandit model, in the fixed-confidence setting. These algorithms belong to the generic family of Gap-Index Focused Algorithms (GIFA) that we introduce for Top-m identification in linear bandits. We propose a unified analysis of these algorithms, which shows how the use of contexts might decrease the sample complexity. We further validate these algorithms empirically on simulated data and on a simple drug repurposing task. Clémence Réda, Emilie Kaufmann, Andrée Delahaye-Duriez |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | Dealing With Misspecification In Fixed-Confidence Linear Top-m IdentificationabstractWe study the problem of the identification of m arms with largest means under a fixed error rate $\delta$ (fixed-confidence Top-m identification), for misspecified linear bandit models. This problem is motivated by practical applications, especially in medicine and recommendation systems, where linear models are popular due to their simplicity and the existence of efficient algorithms, but in which data inevitably deviates from linearity. In this work, we first derive a tractable lower bound on the sample complexity of any $\delta$-correct algorithm for the general Top-m identification problem. We show that knowing the scale of the deviation from linearity is necessary to exploit the structure of the problem. We then describe the first algorithm for this setting, which is both practical and adapts to the amount of misspecification. We derive an upper bound to its sample complexity which confirms this adaptivity and that matches the lower bound when $\delta \rightarrow 0$. Finally, we evaluate our algorithm on both synthetic and real-world data, showing competitive performance with respect to existing baselines. Clémence Réda, Andrea Tirinzoni, Rémy Degenne |
NeurIPS | 1 |