EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Reza Shirkavand
dblp:288/0727
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1455-7419ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% Generative modeling · 12% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Not All Prompts Are Made Equal: Prompt-based Pruning of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025 Efficient Fine-Tuning and Concept Suppression for Pruned Diffusion Models · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bilevel ZOFO: Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning and Meta-Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
concept unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Fine-Tuning and Concept Suppression for Pruned Diffusion Models · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › resource allocation
cost-aware routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cost-Aware Contrastive Routing for LLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Fine-Tuning and Concept Suppression for Pruned Diffusion Models · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › hallucination
hallucination evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMs · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
LLM routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cost-Aware Contrastive Routing for LLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bilevel ZOFO: Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning and Meta-Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
meta-training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bilevel ZOFO: Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning and Meta-Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Not All Prompts Are Made Equal: Prompt-based Pruning of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
model routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cost-Aware Contrastive Routing for LLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cost-Aware Contrastive Routing for LLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bilevel ZOFO: Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning and Meta-Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Not All Prompts Are Made Equal: Prompt-based Pruning of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
video captioning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMs · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bilevel ZOFO: Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning and Meta-Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 1.7bi-level optimization · 1.7zeroth-order optimization · 0.9prompt routing · 0.9penalty method · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9model pruning · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9k-NN · 0.9FAISS · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Efficient Fine-Tuning and Concept Suppression for Pruned Diffusion ModelsabstractRecent advances in diffusion generative models have yielded remarkable progress. While the quality of generated content continues to improve, these models have grown considerably in size and complexity. This increasing computational burden poses significant challenges, particularly in resource-constrained deployment scenarios such as mobile devices. The combination of model pruning and knowledge distillation has emerged as a promising solution to reduce computational demands while preserving generation quality. However, this technique inadvertently propagates undesirable behaviors, including the generation of copyrighted content and unsafe concepts, even when such instances are absent from the fine-tuning dataset. In this paper, we propose a novel bilevel optimization framework for pruned diffusion models that consolidates the fine-tuning and unlearning processes into a unified phase. Our approach maintains the principal advantages of distillation—namely, efficient convergence and style transfer capabilities—while selectively suppressing the generation of unwanted content. This plug-in framework is compatible with various pruning and concept unlearning methods, facilitating efficient, safe deployment of diffusion models in controlled environments. Code is available here. Reza Shirkavand, Peiran Yu, Shangqian Gao, Gowthami Somepalli, Tom Goldstein, Heng Huang 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMsabstractVideo large language models have not yet been widely deployed, largely due to their tendency to hallucinate. Typical benchmarks for Video-LLMs rely simply on multiple-choice questions. Unfortunately, VideoLLMs hallucinate far more aggressively on freeform text generation tasks like video captioning than they do on multiple choice verification tasks. To address this weakness, we propose ARGUS, a VideoLLM benchmark that measures freeform video captioning performance. By comparing VideoLLM outputs to human ground truth captions, ARGUS quantifies dual metrics. First, we measure the rate of hallucinations in the form of incorrect statements about video content or temporal relationships. Second, we measure the rate at which the model omits important descriptive details. Together, these dual metrics form a comprehensive view of video captioning performance. Ruchit Rawal, Reza Shirkavand, Heng Huang 0001, Gowthami Somepalli, Tom Goldstein |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2025 | Not All Prompts Are Made Equal: Prompt-based Pruning of Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsabstractText-to-image (T2I) diffusion models have demonstrated impressive image generation capabilities. Still, their computational intensity prohibits resource-constrained organizations from deploying T2I models after fine-tuning them on their internal *target* data. While pruning techniques offer a potential solution to reduce the computational burden of T2I models, static pruning methods use the same pruned model for all input prompts, overlooking the varying capacity requirements of different prompts. Dynamic pruning addresses this issue by utilizing a separate sub-network for each prompt, but it prevents batch parallelism on GPUs. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Adaptive Prompt-Tailored Pruning (APTP), a novel prompt-based pruning method designed for T2I diffusion models. Central to our approach is a *prompt router* model, which learns to determine the required capacity for an input text prompt and routes it to an architecture code, given a total desired compute budget for prompts. Each architecture code represents a specialized model tailored to the prompts assigned to it, and the number of codes is a hyperparameter. We train the prompt router and architecture codes using contrastive learning, ensuring that similar prompts are mapped to nearby codes. Further, we employ optimal transport to prevent the codes from collapsing into a single one. We demonstrate APTP's effectiveness by pruning Stable Diffusion (SD) V2.1 using CC3M and COCO as *target* datasets. APTP outperforms the single-model pruning baselines in terms of FID, CLIP, and CMMD scores. Our analysis of the clusters learned by APTP reveals they are semantically meaningful. We also show that APTP can automatically discover previously empirically found challenging prompts for SD, *e.g.,* prompts for generating text images, assigning them to higher capacity codes. Alireza Ganjdanesh, Reza Shirkavand, Shangqian Gao, Heng Huang 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Cost-Aware Contrastive Routing for LLMsabstractWe study cost-aware routing for large language models across diverse and dynamic pools of models. Existing approaches often overlook prompt-specific context, rely on expensive model profiling, assume a fixed set of experts, or use inefficient trial-and-error strategies. We introduce Cost-Spectrum Contrastive Routing (CSCR), a lightweight framework that maps both prompts and models into a shared embedding space to enable fast, cost-sensitive selection. CSCR uses compact, fast-to-compute logit footprints for open-source models and perplexity fingerprints for black-box APIs. A contrastive encoder is trained to favor the cheapest accurate expert within adaptive cost bands. At inference time, routing reduces to a single $k$‑NN lookup via a FAISS index, requiring no retraining when the expert pool changes and enabling microsecond latency. Across multiple benchmarks, CSCR consistently outperforms baselines, improving the accuracy–cost tradeoff by up to 25\%, while generalizing robustly to unseen LLMs and out-of-distribution prompts. Reza Shirkavand, Shangqian Gao, Peiran Yu, Heng Huang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Bilevel ZOFO: Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning and Meta-TrainingabstractFine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream tasks using First-Order (FO) optimizers presents significant computational challenges. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning~(PEFT) methods have been proposed to address these challenges by freezing most model parameters and training only a small subset. While PEFT is efficient, it may not outperform full fine-tuning when high task-specific performance is required.
Zeroth-Order (ZO) methods offer an alternative for fine-tuning the entire pre-trained model by approximating gradients using only the forward pass, thus eliminating the computational burden of back-propagation,
% in first-order methods,
but they converge painfully slowly and are very sensitive to the choice of task prompts.
We bridge these worlds with Bilevel‑ZOFO, a penalty‑based bilevel formulation that treats adapter parameters as a lower‑level learner coupled to an upper‑level ZO optimizer of the full backbone. This double-loop optimization strategy only requires the gradient of the PEFT model and the forward pass of the base model. We provide theoretical convergence guarantees for Bilevel ZOFO. Empirically, we demonstrate that Bilevel-ZOFO significantly outperforms existing ZO methods, achieves 2–4$\times$ faster training, and reduces sensitivity to prompts. Bilevel-ZOFO also outperforms FO PEFT methods while maintaining similar memory efficiency. Additionally, we show its strong potential for meta learning. Reza Shirkavand, Peiran Yu, Heng Huang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |