Natural language explanation in visual question answer (VQA-NLE) aims to explain the decision-making process of models by generating natural language sentences to increase users' trust in the black-box systems. Existing post-hoc methods have achieved significant progress in obtaining a plausible explanation. However, such post-hoc explanations are not always aligned with human logical inference, suffering from the issues on: 1) Deductive unsatisfiability, the generated explanations do not logically lead to the answer; 2) Factual inconsistency, the model falsifies its counterfactual explanation for answers without considering the facts in images; and 3) Semantic perturbation insensitivity, the model can not recognize the semantic changes caused by small perturbations. These problems reduce the faithfulness of explanations generated by models. To address the above issues, we propose a novel self-supervised Multi-level Contrastive Learning based natural language Explanation model (MCLE) for VQA with semantic-level, image-level, and instance-level factual and counterfactual samples. MCLE extracts discriminative features and aligns the feature spaces from explanations with visual question and answer to generate more consistent explanations. We conduct extensive experiments, ablation analysis, and case study to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on two VQA-NLE benchmarks.

In multi-domain task-oriented dialogue systems, users proactively propose a series of domain-specific requests that can often be under-or over-specified, sometimes with ambiguous and cross-domain demands. System-sided initiative would be necessary to identify certain situations and appropriately interact with users to resolve them. However, most existing task-oriented dialogue systems fail to consider such mixed-initiative interaction strategies, performing low efficiency and poor collaboration ability in human-computer conversation. In this paper, we construct a multi-domain task-oriented dialogue dataset with mixed-initiative strategies named TITAN from the large-scale dialogue corpus MultiWOZ 2.1. It contains a total of 1,800 human-human conversations where the system can either ask clarification questions actively or provides relevant information to address failure situations and implicit user requests. We report the results of several baseline models on system response generation and dialogue act prediction to assess the performance of SOTA methods on TITAN. These models can capture mixed-initiative dialogue acts, while remaining the deficiency to actively generate implicit requests and accurately provide alternative information, suggesting ample room for improvement in future studies.