EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Muhammad Mubashar
dblp:288/7538
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning
belief functions |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Set Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Set Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Set Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Set Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random sets · 0.9conformal prediction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Unified Evaluation Framework for Epistemic PredictionsabstractPredictions of uncertainty-aware models are diverse, ranging from single point estimates (often averaged over prediction samples) to predictive distributions, to set-valued or credal-set representations. We propose a novel unified evaluation framework for uncertainty-aware classifiers, applicable to a wide range of model classes, which allows users to tailor the trade-off between accuracy and precision of predictions via a suitably designed performance metric. This makes possible the selection of the most suitable model for a particular real-world application as a function of the desired trade-off. Our experiments, concerning Bayesian, ensemble, evidential, deterministic, credal and belief function classifiers on the CIFAR-10, MNIST and CIFAR-100 datasets, show that the metric behaves as desired. Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal, Muhammad Mubashar, Fabio Cuzzolin |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2025 | Random-Set Neural NetworksabstractMachine learning is increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains where erroneous predictions may lead to potentially catastrophic consequences, highlighting the need for learning systems to be aware of how confident they are in their own predictions: in other words, 'to know when they do not know’. In this paper, we propose a novel Random-Set Neural Network (RS-NN) approach to classification which predicts *belief functions* (rather than classical probability vectors) over the class list using the mathematics of *random sets*, i.e., distributions over the collection of *sets* of classes. RS-NN encodes the 'epistemic' uncertainty induced by training sets that are insufficiently representative or limited in size via the size of the convex set of probability vectors associated with a predicted belief function. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art Bayesian and Ensemble methods in terms of accuracy, uncertainty estimation and out-of-distribution (OoD) detection on multiple benchmarks (CIFAR-10 vs SVHN/Intel-Image, MNIST vs FMNIST/KMNIST, ImageNet vs ImageNet-O). RS-NN also scales up effectively to large-scale architectures (e.g. WideResNet-28-10, VGG16, Inception V3, EfficientNetB2 and ViT-Base-16),
exhibits remarkable robustness to adversarial attacks and can provide statistical guarantees in a conformal learning setting. Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal, Muhammad Mubashar, Keivan Shariatmadar, Fabio Cuzzolin |
ICLR | 2 |