Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dohun Lim
dblp:289/1154
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Reinforcement learning · 33% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › continuous control
physics-based motion control |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BRIC: Bridging Kinematic Plans and Physical Control at Test Time · AAAI 2026 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › motion synthesis
human motion synthesis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BRIC: Bridging Kinematic Plans and Physical Control at Test Time · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Building Reliable Explanations of Unreliable Neural Networks: Locally Smoothing Perspective of Model Interpretation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Building Reliable Explanations of Unreliable Neural Networks: Locally Smoothing Perspective of Model Interpretation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Building Reliable Explanations of Unreliable Neural Networks: Locally Smoothing Perspective of Model Interpretation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Building Reliable Explanations of Unreliable Neural Networks: Locally Smoothing Perspective of Model Interpretation · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test-time adaptation · 2.0reinforcement learning · 2.0diffusion model · 2.0local smoothing · 0.5l1 regularization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | BRIC: Bridging Kinematic Plans and Physical Control at Test TimeabstractWe propose BRIC, a novel test-time adaptation (TTA) framework that enables long-term human motion generation by resolving execution discrepancies between diffusion-based kinematic motion planners and reinforcement learning-based physics controllers. While diffusion models can generate diverse and expressive motions conditioned on text and scene context, they often produce physically implausible outputs, leading to execution drift during simulation. To address this, BRIC dynamically adapts the physics controller to noisy motion plans at test time, while preserving pre-trained skills via a loss function that mitigates catastrophic forgetting. In addition, BRIC introduces a lightweight test-time guidance mechanism that steers the diffusion model in the signal space without updating its parameters. By combining both adaptation strategies, BRIC ensures consistent and physically plausible long-term executions across diverse environments in an effective and efficient manner. We validate the effectiveness of BRIC on a variety of long-term tasks, including motion composition, obstacle avoidance, and human-scene interaction, achieving state-of-the-art performance across all tasks. Dohun Lim, Jaewoon Lim, Sungchan Kim |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Building Reliable Explanations of Unreliable Neural Networks: Locally Smoothing Perspective of Model InterpretationabstractWe present a novel method for reliably explaining the predictions of neural networks. We consider an explanation reliable if it identifies input features relevant to the model output by considering the input and the neighboring data points. Our method is built on top of the assumption of smooth landscape in a loss function of the model prediction: locally consistent loss and gradient profile. A theoretical analysis established in this study suggests that those locally smooth model explanations are learned using a batch of noisy copies of the input with the L1 regularization for a saliency map. Extensive experiments support the analysis results, revealing that the proposed saliency maps retrieve the original classes of adversarial examples crafted against both naturally and adversarially trained models, significantly outperforming previous methods. We further demonstrated that such good performance results from the learning capability of this method to identify input features that are truly relevant to the model output of the input and the neighboring data points, fulfilling the requirements of a reliable explanation. Dohun Lim, Sungchan Kim |
CVPR | 1 |