Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harold Triedman

dblp:289/1696 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5231-7059ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.012026
"Having Confidence in My Confidence Intervals": How Data Users Engage with Privacy-Protected Wikipedia Data · CHI 2026
Privacy and data protection › data publishing
privacy-preserving data publishing
1.012026
"Having Confidence in My Confidence Intervals": How Data Users Engage with Privacy-Protected Wikipedia Data · CHI 2026
Design research and methods › user-centered design
contextual inquiry
0.312026
"Having Confidence in My Confidence Intervals": How Data Users Engage with Privacy-Protected Wikipedia Data · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

task-based study · 2.0contextual inquiry · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 "Having Confidence in My Confidence Intervals": How Data Users Engage with Privacy-Protected Wikipedia Data
abstract
In response to calls for open data and growing privacy threats, organizations are increasingly adopting privacy-preserving techniques that add noise to published datasets. These techniques seek to protect privacy of data subjects while enabling useful analyses. With expert feedback, we developed empirically-driven documentation explaining the noise characteristics of two Wikipedia pageview datasets: one using rounding (heuristic privacy) and another using differential privacy (DP, formal privacy). We then used these documents to conduct a task-based contextual inquiry (n=15) exploring how data users—largely unfamiliar with these methods—perceive, interact with, and interpret privacy-preserving noise during data analysis.
Harold Triedman, Jayshree Sarathy, Priyanka Nanayakkara, Rachel Cummings, Gabriel Kaptchuk, Sean Kross, Elissa M. Redmiles
CHI1
2021 A New Model for Weaving Responsible Computing Into Courses Across the CS Curriculum
abstract
CS departments in the USA have used various models for teaching about ethics, including standalone ethics courses and expert-designed assignments. At Brown University, we are trying a different approach: a group of undergraduate teaching assistants dedicated to socially-responsible practices in computing work with faculty to integrate content into multiple assignments both across a course and across the curriculum. This "responsible computing" initiative has resulted in a variety of assignments added to 13 different courses in the past year. This paper describes the program's design, sample assignments, results of an internal evaluation, and refinements we are making to the model. We contrast our model to others from the literature in hopes of expanding the collection of curricular ideas for designing education in responsible computing.
Lena Cohen, Heila Precel, Harold Triedman, Kathi Fisler
SIGCSE3