Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chengjia Shao
dblp:289/6063
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0007-7879-9560ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 67% Integrated circuit design · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › physical design › placement › circuit placement
3D IC placement |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Snap-3D: A Constrained Placement-Driven Physical Design Methodology for High Performance 3-D ICs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023 |
Integrated circuit design
heterogeneous integration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Snap-3D: A Constrained Placement-Driven Physical Design Methodology for High Performance 3-D ICs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Snap-3D: A Constrained Placement-Driven Physical Design Methodology for High Performance 3-D ICs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tier partitioning · 0.7constrained placement · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Snap-3D: A Constrained Placement-Driven Physical Design Methodology for High Performance 3-D ICsabstract3-D integration technology is one of the leading options to advance Moore’s Law beyond conventional scaling. One of the 3-D integration choice is the heterogeneous integration with the benefits of power saving over the homogeneous integration. With the lack of commercial 3-D tools, existing 3-D physical design flows utilize 2-D commercial tools to perform 3-D integrated circuit (3-D IC) physical synthesis. Specifically, these flows build 2-D designs first and then convert them into 3-D designs. However, several works demonstrate that design qualities degrade during this 2-D–3-D transformation and some of the flows do not support heterogeneous integration. In this article, we propose Snap-3D, a constraint-driven placement approach to build commercial-quality 3-D ICs, which supports both homogeneous and heterogeneous 3-D ICs. Our key idea is based on the observation that if the standard cell height is contracted and partitioned into multiple tiers, any commercial 2-D placer can place them onto the row structure and naturally achieve high-quality 3-D placement. This methodology is shown to optimize power, performance, and area (PPA) metrics across different tiers simultaneously and minimize the aforementioned design quality loss. Experimental results on seven industrial designs demonstrate that Snap-3D achieves up to 10.9% wirelength, 9% power, and 25% performance improvements compared with state-of-the-art 3-D design flows. Pruek Vanna-Iampikul, Chengjia Shao, Yi-Chen Lu, Sai Pentapati, Yun Heo, Jae-Seung Choi, Sung Kyu Lim |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 2 |
| 2021 | Snap-3D: A Constrained Placement-Driven Physical Design Methodology for Face-to-Face-Bonded 3D ICsabstract3D integration technology is one of the leading options that can advance Moore's Law beyond conventional scaling. Due to the absence of commercial 3D placers and routers, existing 3D physical design flows rely heavily on 2D commercial tools to handle 3D IC physical synthesis. Specifically, these flows build 2D designs first and then convert them into 3D designs. However, several works demonstrate that design qualities degrade during this 2D-3D transformation. In this paper, we overcome this issue with our Snap-3D, a constraint-driven placement approach to build commercial-quality 3D ICs. Our key idea is based on the observation that if the standard cell height is contracted by one half and partitioned into multiple tiers, any commercial 2D placer can place them onto the row structure and naturally achieve high-quality 3D placement. This methodology is shown to optimize power, performance, and area (PPA) metrics across different tiers simultaneously and minimize the aforementioned design quality loss. Experimental results on 7 industrial designs demonstrate that Snap-3D achieves up to 5.4% wirelength, 10.1% power, and 92.3% total negative slack improvements compared with state-of-the-art 3D design flows. Pruek Vanna-Iampikul, Chengjia Shao, Yi-Chen Lu, Sai Pentapati, Sung Kyu Lim |
ISPD | 2 |