Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicolas Zucchet
dblp:289/6252
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 54% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20% Optimization for machine learning · 9% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Recurrent neural networks: vanishing and exploding gradients are not the end of the story · NeurIPS 2024 Online learning of long-range dependencies · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | A contrastive rule for meta-learning · NeurIPS 2022 Learning where to learn: Gradient sparsity in meta and continual learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Recurrent neural networks: vanishing and exploding gradients are not the end of the story · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
long-range dependency modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online learning of long-range dependencies · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online learning of long-range dependencies · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A contrastive rule for meta-learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equilibrium models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The least-control principle for local learning at equilibrium · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
gradient-based meta-learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A contrastive rule for meta-learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
local learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The least-control principle for local learning at equilibrium · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning where to learn: Gradient sparsity in meta and continual learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Recurrent neural networks: vanishing and exploding gradients are not the end of the story · NeurIPS 2024 |
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Online learning of long-range dependencies · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training › local learning
contrastive hebbian learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A contrastive rule for meta-learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | The least-control principle for local learning at equilibrium · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
synaptic plasticity |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A contrastive rule for meta-learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online gradient estimation · 1.3independent recurrent modules · 1.3parametrization design · 0.8gradient sensitivity analysis · 0.8optimal control · 0.6local credit assignment · 0.6gradient estimation · 0.6equilibrium propagation · 0.6contrastive hebbian learning · 0.6few-shot learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The emergence of sparse attention: impact of data distribution and benefits of repetitionabstractEmergence is a fascinating property of large language models and neural networks more broadly: as models scale and train for longer, they sometimes develop new abilities in sudden ways. Despite initial studies, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of how and when these abilities emerge. To address this gap, we study the emergence over training of sparse attention, a critical and frequently observed attention pattern in Transformers. By combining theoretical analysis of a toy model with empirical observations on small Transformers trained on a linear regression variant, we uncover the mechanics driving sparse attention emergence and reveal that emergence timing follows power laws based on task structure, architecture, and optimizer choice. We additionally find that repetition can greatly speed up emergence. Finally, we confirm these results on a well-studied in-context associative recall task. Our findings provide a simple, theoretically grounded framework for understanding how data distributions and model design influence the learning dynamics behind one form of emergence. Nicolas Zucchet, Francesco D'Angelo, Andrew K. Lampinen, Stephanie C. Y. Chan |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Recurrent neural networks: vanishing and exploding gradients are not the end of the storyabstractRecurrent neural networks (RNNs) notoriously struggle to learn long-term memories, primarily due to vanishing and exploding gradients. The recent success of state-space models (SSMs), a subclass of RNNs, to overcome such difficulties challenges our theoretical understanding. In this paper, we delve into the optimization challenges of RNNs and discover that, as the memory of a network increases, changes in its parameters result in increasingly large output variations, making gradient-based learning highly sensitive, even without exploding gradients. Our analysis further reveals the importance of the element-wise recurrence design pattern combined with careful parametrizations in mitigating this effect. This feature is present in SSMs, as well as in other architectures, such as LSTMs. Overall, our insights provide a new explanation for some of the difficulties in gradient-based learning of RNNs and why some architectures perform better than others. Nicolas Zucchet, Antonio Orvieto |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Online learning of long-range dependenciesabstractOnline learning holds the promise of enabling efficient long-term credit assignment in recurrent neural networks. However, current algorithms fall short of offline backpropagation by either not being scalable or failing to learn long-range dependencies. Here we present a high-performance online learning algorithm that merely doubles the memory and computational requirements of a single inference pass. We achieve this by leveraging independent recurrent modules in multi-layer networks, an architectural motif that has recently been shown to be particularly powerful. Experiments on synthetic memory problems and on the challenging long-range arena benchmark suite reveal that our algorithm performs competitively, establishing a new standard for what can be achieved through online learning. This ability to learn long-range dependencies offers a new perspective on learning in the brain and opens a promising avenue in neuromorphic computing. Nicolas Zucchet, Robert Meier, Simon Schug, Asier Mujika, João Sacramento |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | The least-control principle for local learning at equilibriumabstractEquilibrium systems are a powerful way to express neural computations. As special cases, they include models of great current interest in both neuroscience and machine learning, such as deep neural networks, equilibrium recurrent neural networks, deep equilibrium models, or meta-learning. Here, we present a new principle for learning such systems with a temporally- and spatially-local rule. Our principle casts learning as a \emph{least-control} problem, where we first introduce an optimal controller to lead the system towards a solution state, and then define learning as reducing the amount of control needed to reach such a state. We show that incorporating learning signals within a dynamics as an optimal control enables transmitting activity-dependent credit assignment information, avoids storing intermediate states in memory, and does not rely on infinitesimal learning signals. In practice, our principle leads to strong performance matching that of leading gradient-based learning methods when applied to an array of problems involving recurrent neural networks and meta-learning. Our results shed light on how the brain might learn and offer new ways of approaching a broad class of machine learning problems. Alexander Meulemans, Nicolas Zucchet, Seijin Kobayashi, Johannes von Oswald, João Sacramento |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | A contrastive rule for meta-learningabstractHumans and other animals are capable of improving their learning performance as they solve related tasks from a given problem domain, to the point of being able to learn from extremely limited data. While synaptic plasticity is generically thought to underlie learning in the brain, the precise neural and synaptic mechanisms by which learning processes improve through experience are not well understood. Here, we present a general-purpose, biologically-plausible meta-learning rule which estimates gradients with respect to the parameters of an underlying learning algorithm by simply running it twice. Our rule may be understood as a generalization of contrastive Hebbian learning to meta-learning and notably, it neither requires computing second derivatives nor going backwards in time, two characteristic features of previous gradient-based methods that are hard to conceive in physical neural circuits. We demonstrate the generality of our rule by applying it to two distinct models: a complex synapse with internal states which consolidate task-shared information, and a dual-system architecture in which a primary network is rapidly modulated by another one to learn the specifics of each task. For both models, our meta-learning rule matches or outperforms reference algorithms on a wide range of benchmark problems, while only using information presumed to be locally available at neurons and synapses. We corroborate these findings with a theoretical analysis of the gradient estimation error incurred by our rule. Nicolas Zucchet, Simon Schug, Johannes von Oswald, Dominic Zhao, João Sacramento |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Beyond Backpropagation: Bilevel Optimization Through Implicit Differentiation and Equilibrium PropagationabstractThis review examines gradient-based techniques to solve bilevel optimization problems. Bilevel optimization extends the loss minimization framework underlying statistical learning to systems that are implicitly defined through a quantity they minimize. This characterization can be applied to neural networks, optimizers, algorithmic solvers, and even physical systems and allows for greater modeling flexibility compared to the usual explicit definition of such systems. We focus on solving learning problems of this kind through gradient descent, leveraging the toolbox of implicit differentiation and, for the first time applied to this setting, the equilibrium propagation theorem. We present the mathematical foundations behind such methods, introduce the gradient estimation algorithms in detail, and compare the competitive advantages of the different approaches. Nicolas Zucchet, João Sacramento |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning where to learn: Gradient sparsity in meta and continual learningabstractFinding neural network weights that generalize well from small datasets is difficult. A promising approach is to learn a weight initialization such that a small number of weight changes results in low generalization error. We show that this form of meta-learning can be improved by letting the learning algorithm decide which weights to change, i.e., by learning where to learn. We find that patterned sparsity emerges from this process, with the pattern of sparsity varying on a problem-by-problem basis. This selective sparsity results in better generalization and less interference in a range of few-shot and continual learning problems. Moreover, we find that sparse learning also emerges in a more expressive model where learning rates are meta-learned. Our results shed light on an ongoing debate on whether meta-learning can discover adaptable features and suggest that learning by sparse gradient descent is a powerful inductive bias for meta-learning systems. Johannes von Oswald, Dominic Zhao, Seijin Kobayashi, Simon Schug, Massimo Caccia, Nicolas Zucchet, João Sacramento |
NeurIPS | 6 |